Back to Search Start Over

Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Authors :
Julian Little
François Audibert
Sylvie Langlois
François Rousseau
Daniel Reinharz
Bounhome Soukkhaphone
Mohammad Baradaran
Ba Diep Nguyen
Leon Nshimyumukiza
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 8 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2023.

Abstract

Objectives To determine the cost-effectiveness of the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), in a prenatal screening programme targeting common aneuploidies.Design, setting and participants A simulation study was conducted to study the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by NIPS (sex chromosome aneuploidies, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, large deletion/duplication >7 Mb and rare autosomal trisomies) to five basic strategies currently aiming the common trisomies: three strategies currently offered by the public healthcare systems in Canada, whose first-tier test is performed with biochemical markers, and two programmes whose first-tier test consists of NIPS-based methods.Outcome measures The total number of cases of chromosomal anomalies detected and the costs related to the consumption of medical services.Results The most effective and the most cost-effective option in almost all prenatal screening strategies is the option that includes all targeted additional conditions. In the strategies where NIPS is used as first-tier testing, the cost per additional case detected by adding all possible additional anomalies to a programme that currently targets only common trisomies is $C25 710 (95% CI $C25 489 to $C25 934) for massively parallel shotgun sequencing and $C57 711 (95% CI $C57 141 to $C58 292) for targeted massively parallel sequencing, respectively. The acceptability curves show that at a willingness-to-pay of $C50 000 per one additional case detected, the expansion of NIPS-based methods for the detection of all possible additional conditions has a 90% probability of being cost-effective.Conclusion From an economic perspective, in strategies that use NIPS as a first-tier screening test, expanding the programmes to detect any considered chromosomal anomalies other than the three common trisomies would be cost-effective. However, the potential expansion of prenatal screening programmes also requires consideration of societal issues, including ethical ones.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
13
Issue :
8
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.74c8674828746edba25d19c081f4329
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069485