Back to Search Start Over

Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration

Authors :
John Whitaker
Radhouene Neji
Nicholas Byrne
Esther Puyol-Antón
Rahul K. Mukherjee
Steven E. Williams
Henry Chubb
Louisa O’Neill
Orod Razeghi
Adam Connolly
Kawal Rhode
Steven Niederer
Andrew King
Cory Tschabrunn
Elad Anter
Reza Nezafat
Martin J. Bishop
Mark O’Neill
Reza Razavi
Sébastien Roujol
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2019.

Abstract

Abstract Background Ex-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has played an important role in the validation of in-vivo CMR characterization of pathological processes. However, comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging remains challenging due to shape changes occurring between the two states, which may be non-uniform across the diseased heart. A novel two-step process to facilitate registration between ex-vivo and in-vivo CMR was developed and evaluated in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI). Methods Seven weeks after ischemia-reperfusion MI, 12 swine underwent in-vivo CMR imaging with late gadolinium enhancement followed by ex-vivo CMR 1 week later. Five animals comprised the control group, in which ex-vivo imaging was undertaken without any support in the LV cavity, 7 animals comprised the experimental group, in which a two-step registration optimization process was undertaken. The first step involved a heart specific flexible 3D printed scaffold generated from in-vivo CMR, which was used to maintain left ventricular (LV) shape during ex-vivo imaging. In the second step, a non-rigid co-registration algorithm was applied to align in-vivo and ex-vivo data. Tissue dimension changes between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging were compared between the experimental and control group. In the experimental group, tissue compartment volumes and thickness were compared between in-vivo and ex-vivo data before and after non-rigid registration. The effectiveness of the alignment was assessed quantitatively using the DICE similarity coefficient. Results LV cavity volume changed more in the control group (ratio of cavity volume between ex-vivo and in-vivo imaging in control and experimental group 0.14 vs 0.56, p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532429X and 74754297
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.74754297b562494da7bb5cf1beb070a1
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0574-z