Back to Search Start Over

Hospital-based caregiver intervention for people following hip fracture surgery (HIP HELPER): multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial with embedded qualitative study in England

Authors :
Phillipa Logan
Sally Hopewell
Matthew L Costa
Allan B Clark
Susan Dutton
Sarah Lamb
Sarah Hanson
Toby O Smith
Opinder Sahota
Melissa Taylor
Alex Herring
Yan Cunningham
Maninderpal Matharu
Diane Williams
Maria Crotty
K PFEIFFER
Helen Jowett
Polly-Anna Ashford
Reema Khoury
Allie Welsh
Kelly Grant
Rene Gray
Penny Clifford
Lis Freeman
Sarah Langford
Dr Mark Baxter
Jessica Pawson
Anna Mellows
Kate Lacey
Anna Cromie
Gail Menton
Warren Corbett
Vishwanath Joshi
Maria Baggot
Katie Sheehan
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 12 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2023.

Abstract

Objectives To assess the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an informal caregiver training programme to support the recovery of people following hip fracture surgery.Design Two-arm, multicentre, pragmatic, open, feasibility RCT with embedded qualitative study.Setting National Health Service (NHS) providers in five English hospitals.Participants Community-dwelling adults, aged 60 years and over, who undergo hip fracture surgery and their informal caregivers.Intervention Usual care: usual NHS care. Experimental: usual NHS care plus a caregiver–patient dyad training programme (HIP HELPER). This programme comprised three, 1 hour, one-to-one training sessions for a patient and caregiver, delivered by a nurse, physiotherapist or occupational therapist in the hospital setting predischarge. After discharge, patients and caregivers were supported through three telephone coaching sessions.Randomisation and blinding Central randomisation was computer generated (1:1), stratified by hospital and level of patient cognitive impairment. There was no blinding.Main outcome measures Data collected at baseline and 4 months post randomisation included: screening logs, intervention logs, fidelity checklists, acceptability data and clinical outcomes. Interviews were conducted with a subset of participants and health professionals.Results 102 participants were enrolled (51 patients; 51 caregivers). Thirty-nine per cent (515/1311) of patients screened were eligible. Eleven per cent (56/515) of eligible patients consented to be randomised. Forty-eight per cent (12/25) of the intervention group reached compliance to their allocated intervention. There was no evidence of treatment contamination. Qualitative data demonstrated the trial and HIP HELPER programme was acceptable.Conclusions The HIP HELPER programme was acceptable to patient–caregiver dyads and health professionals. The COVID-19 pandemic impacting on site’s ability to deliver the research. Modifications are necessary to the design for a viable definitive RCT.Trial registration number ISRCTN13270387.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
13
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.73667d61ce094d3682c5f414d19c1c6e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073611