Back to Search Start Over

Consensus on diagnosis and management of non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer in Brazil: focus on patient, selection, treatment efficacy, side effects and physician's perception according to patient comorbidities

Authors :
Fernando Maluf
Andrey Soares
Guilherme Avanço
Aline Lury Hada
Ana Paula Garcia Cardoso
Arie Carneiro
Daniel Herchenhorn
Denis Leonardo Fontes Jardim
Fabio Augusto Schutz
Fabio Roberto Kater
Felipe Moraes Toledo Pereira
Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro
Igor Alexandre Protzner Morbeck
João Francisco Navarro Reolon
Karine Martins da Trindade
Livia Maria Querino da Silvo Andrade
Lucas Mendes Nogueira
Renato Furoni
Ricardo Azze Natel
Rodolfo Borges dos Reis
Rodrigo Nogueira Fogace
Vinicius Carrera Souza
Source :
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol 47, Iss 2, Pp 359-373 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, 2021.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (M0 CRPC) has seen important developments in drugs and diagnostic tools in the last two years. New hormonal agents have demonstrated improvement in metastasis free survival in M0 CRPC patients and have been approved by regulatory agencies in Brazil. Additionally, newer and more sensitive imaging tools are able to detect metastasis earlier than before, which will impact the percentage of patients staged as M0 CRPC. Based on the available international guidelines, a group of Brazilian urology and medical oncology experts developed and completed a survey on the diagnosis and treatment of M0 CRPC in Brazil. These results are reviewed and summarized and associated recommendations are provided. Objective: To present survey results on management of M0 CRPC in Brazil. Design, setting, and participants: A panel of six Brazilian prostate cancer experts determined 64 questions concerning the main areas of interest: 1) staging tools, 2) treatments, 3) side effects of systemic treatment/s, and 4) osteoclast-targeted therapy. A larger panel of 28 Brazilian prostate cancer experts answered these questions in order to create country-specific recommendations discussed in this manuscript. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on the predefined questions. These answers are the panelists' opinions, not a literature review or meta-analysis. Therapies not yet approved in Brazil were excluded from answer options. Each question had five to seven relevant answers including two non-answers. Results were tabulated in real time. Conclusions: The results and recommendations presented can be used by Brazilian physicians to support the management of M0 CRPC patients. Individual clinical decision making should be supported by available data, however, for Brazil, guidelines for diagnosis and management of M0 CRPC patients have not been developed. This document will serve as a point of reference when confronting this disease stage.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16776119 and 16775538
Volume :
47
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.71c2709fc76e4b5fb64f15a3274c9006
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0249