Effect of minimally external surgery under microscopy on the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

AIM:To observe, analyze and compare the effect of minimally external surgery under microscopy and traditional external surgery on the treatment of non-complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS:The clinical data of 53 patients with 53 eyes of non-complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in our hospital was analyzed retrospectively, of which the minimally external retinal detachment surgery under microscopy was performed in 25 patients with 25 eyes of non-complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(the research group), and the traditional external retinal detachment surgery was performed in 28 patients with 28 eyes of non-complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(the control group). All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon, and the clinical efficacy and complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: In postoperative hole closure, there was no significant difference in the primary rate of reattachment of the retina between the two groups(P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups(PP>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in operative time between the two groups(PCONCLUSION: The effect of minimally external retinal surgery under microscopy and traditional external retinal surgery is similar in the treatment of non-complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, but the minimally external retinal surgery has the advantages of shorter time, less damage and fewer complications.