Back to Search Start Over

Decision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid scoping review

Authors :
Ben Lambert
Sassy Molyneux
Claire Marriott Keene
Prabin Dahal
Kasia Stepniewska
Sheetal Silal
Richard Lewis
Sabine Dittrich
Sunil Pokharel
Siyu Chen
Bo Gao
Umar Mahmood
Ricardo Aguas
Marta Wanat
Lisa White
Rima Shretta
Wirichada Pan-Ngum
Ainura Moldokmatova
Caroline Franco
Sompob Saralamba
Jared Norman
Rachel Hounsell
Reshania Naidoo
Melinda C Mills
Lisa J White
Merryn Voysey
Liberty Cantrell
Sophie Dickinson
Billie Andersen-Waine
Angus Ferguson-Lewis
Anastasia Polner
Ma’ayan Amswych
Anastasiia Polner
Claire Keene
Emily Rowe
Kweku Bimpong
Joseph L-H Tsui
Ma'ayan Amswych
Muhammad Kasim
Randolph Ngwafor Anye
Richard Creswell
Sumali Bajaj
Tracy Evans
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 14, Iss 3 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2024.

Abstract

Objective Testing for COVID-19 was a key component of the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This strategy relied on positive individuals self-isolating to reduce transmission, making isolation the lynchpin in the public health approach. Therefore, we scoped evidence to systematically identify and categorise barriers and facilitators to compliance with self-isolation guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, to inform public health strategies in future pandemics.Design A rapid scoping review was conducted.Search strategy Key terms were used to search literature databases (PubMed, Scopus and the WHO COVID-19 Research Database, on 7 November 2022), Google Scholar and stakeholder-identified manuscripts, ultimately including evidence published in English from UK-based studies conducted between 2020 and 2022.Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted and synthesised into themes, organised broadly into capability, opportunity and motivation, and reviewed with key stakeholders from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).Results We included 105 sources, with 63 identified from UKHSA and used to inform their decision-making during the pandemic. Influences on the decision to comply with isolation guidance were categorised into six themes: perceived ability to isolate; information and guidance; logistics; social influences, including trust; perceived value; and perceived consequences. Individuals continuously assessed these factors in deciding whether or not to comply with guidance and self-isolate.Conclusions Decisions to self-isolate after a positive test were influenced by multiple factors, including individuals’ beliefs, concerns, priorities and personal circumstances. Future testing strategies must facilitate meaningful financial, practical and mental health support to allow individuals to overcome the perceived and actual negative consequences of isolating. Clear, consistent communication of the purpose and procedures of isolating will also be critical to support compliance with self-isolation guidance, and should leverage people’s perceived value in protecting others. Building public trust is also essential, but requires investment before the next pandemic starts.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
14
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7080cbb8e1e4a56a3a5fcb7cc8dc050
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437