Back to Search Start Over

Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health‐care professionals: Co‐construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives

Authors :
Marie‐Pascale Pomey
Nathalie Clavel
Louise Normandin
Claudio Del Grande
Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri
Isabel Fernandez‐McAuley
Antoine Boivin
Luigi Flora
Annie Janvier
Philippe Karazivan
Jean‐François Pelletier
Nicolas Fernandez
Jesseca Paquette
Vincent Dumez
Source :
Health Expectations, Vol 24, Iss 4, Pp 1230-1241 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Context Partnership between patients and health‐care professionals (HCPs) is a concept that needs a valid, practical measure to facilitate its use by patients and HCPs. Objective To co‐construct a tool for measuring the degree of partnership between patients and HCPs. Design The CADICEE tool was developed in four steps: (1) generate key dimensions of patient partnership in clinical care; (2) co‐construct the tool; (3) assess face and content validity from patients’ and HCPs’ viewpoints; and (4) assess the usability of the tool and explore its measurement performance. Results The CADICEE tool comprises 24 items under 7 dimensions: 1) relationship of Confidence or trust between the patient and the HCPs; 2) patient Autonomy; 3) patient participation in Decisions related to care; 4) shared Information on patient health status or care; 5) patient personal Context; 6) Empathy; and 7) recognition of Expertise. Assessment of the tool's usability and measurement performance showed, in a convenience sample of 246 patients and relatives, high face validity, acceptability and relevance for both patients and HCPs, as well as good construct validity. Conclusions The CADICEE tool is developed in co‐construction with patients to evaluate the degree of partnership in care desired by patients in their relationship with HCPs. The tool can be used in various clinical contexts and in different health‐care settings. Patient or Public Contribution Patients were involved in determining the importance of constructing this questionnaire. They co‐constructed it, pre‐tested it and were part of the entire questionnaire development process. Three patients participated in the writing of the article.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13697625 and 13696513
Volume :
24
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Health Expectations
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6e75fbb3c3e48ca947a5e4a68916d4c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13253