Back to Search Start Over

External Validation of Updated Prediction Models for Neurological Outcomes at 90 Days in Patients With Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Authors :
Norihiro Nishioka
Tomoki Yamada
Shunichiro Nakao
Kazuhisa Yoshiya
Changhwi Park
Tetsuro Nishimura
Takuya Ishibe
Kazuma Yamakawa
Takeyuki Kiguchi
Masafumi Kishimoto
Kohei Ninomiya
Yusuke Ito
Taku Sogabe
Takaya Morooka
Haruko Sakamoto
Yuki Hironaka
Atsunori Onoe
Tasuku Matsuyama
Yohei Okada
Satoshi Matsui
Satoshi Yoshimura
Shunsuke Kimata
Shunsuke Kawai
Yuto Makino
Ling Zha
Kosuke Kiyohara
Tetsuhisa Kitamura
Taku Iwami
Source :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, Vol 13, Iss 9 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wiley, 2024.

Abstract

Background Few prediction models for individuals with early‐stage out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have undergone external validation. This study aimed to externally validate updated prediction models for OHCA outcomes using a large nationwide dataset. Methods and Results We performed a secondary analysis of the JAAM‐OHCA (Comprehensive Registry of In‐Hospital Intensive Care for Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest) registry. Previously developed prediction models for patients with cardiac arrest who achieved the return of spontaneous circulation were updated. External validation was conducted using data from 56 institutions from the JAAM–OHCA registry. The primary outcome was a dichotomized 90‐day cerebral performance category score. Two models were updated using the derivation set (n=3337). Model 1 included patient demographics, prehospital information, and the initial rhythm upon hospital admission; Model 2 included information obtained in the hospital immediately after the return of spontaneous circulation. In the validation set (n=4250), Models 1 and 2 exhibited a C‐statistic of 0.945 (95% CI, 0.935–0.955) and 0.958 (95% CI, 0.951–0.960), respectively. Both models were well‐calibrated to the observed outcomes. The decision curve analysis showed that Model 2 demonstrated higher net benefits at all risk thresholds than Model 1. A web‐based calculator was developed to estimate the probability of poor outcomes (https://pcas‐prediction.shinyapps.io/90d_lasso/). Conclusions The updated models offer valuable information to medical professionals in the prediction of long‐term neurological outcomes for patients with OHCA, potentially playing a vital role in clinical decision‐making processes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20479980
Volume :
13
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6cd223ab5eaf4d8580e44bd1fa1df2a2
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.033824