Back to Search Start Over

Building a transdisciplinary expert consensus on the cognitive drivers of performance under pressure: An international multi-panel Delphi study

Authors :
Lucy Albertella
Rebecca Kirkham
Amy B. Adler
John Crampton
Sean P. A. Drummond
Gerard J. Fogarty
James J. Gross
Leonard Zaichkowsky
Judith P. Andersen
Paul T. Bartone
Danny Boga
Jeffrey W. Bond
Tad T. Brunyé
Mark J. Campbell
Liliana G. Ciobanu
Scott R. Clark
Monique F. Crane
Arne Dietrich
Tracy J. Doty
James E. Driskell
Ivar Fahsing
Stephen M. Fiore
Rhona Flin
Joachim Funke
Justine M. Gatt
P. A. Hancock
Craig Harper
Andrew Heathcote
Kristin J. Heaton
Werner F. Helsen
Erika K. Hussey
Robin C. Jackson
Sangeet Khemlani
William D. S. Killgore
Sabina Kleitman
Andrew M. Lane
Shayne Loft
Clare MacMahon
Samuele M. Marcora
Frank P. McKenna
Carla Meijen
Vanessa Moulton
Gene M. Moyle
Eugene Nalivaiko
Donna O'Connor
Dorothea O’Conor
Debra Patton
Mark D. Piccolo
Coleman Ruiz
Linda Schücker
Ron A. Smith
Sarah J. R. Smith
Chava Sobrino
Melba Stetz
Damien Stewart
Paul Taylor
Andrew J. Tucker
Haike van Stralen
Joan N. Vickers
Troy A. W Visser
Rohan Walker
Mark W. Wiggins
Andrew Mark Williams
Leonard Wong
Eugene Aidman
Murat Yücel
Source :
Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 13 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2023.

Abstract

IntroductionThe ability to perform optimally under pressure is critical across many occupations, including the military, first responders, and competitive sport. Despite recognition that such performance depends on a range of cognitive factors, how common these factors are across performance domains remains unclear. The current study sought to integrate existing knowledge in the performance field in the form of a transdisciplinary expert consensus on the cognitive mechanisms that underlie performance under pressure.MethodsInternational experts were recruited from four performance domains [(i) Defense; (ii) Competitive Sport; (iii) Civilian High-stakes; and (iv) Performance Neuroscience]. Experts rated constructs from the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework (and several expert-suggested constructs) across successive rounds, until all constructs reached consensus for inclusion or were eliminated. Finally, included constructs were ranked for their relative importance.ResultsSixty-eight experts completed the first Delphi round, with 94% of experts retained by the end of the Delphi process. The following 10 constructs reached consensus across all four panels (in order of overall ranking): (1) Attention; (2) Cognitive Control—Performance Monitoring; (3) Arousal and Regulatory Systems—Arousal; (4) Cognitive Control—Goal Selection, Updating, Representation, and Maintenance; (5) Cognitive Control—Response Selection and Inhibition/Suppression; (6) Working memory—Flexible Updating; (7) Working memory—Active Maintenance; (8) Perception and Understanding of Self—Self-knowledge; (9) Working memory—Interference Control, and (10) Expert-suggested—Shifting.DiscussionOur results identify a set of transdisciplinary neuroscience-informed constructs, validated through expert consensus. This expert consensus is critical to standardizing cognitive assessment and informing mechanism-targeted interventions in the broader field of human performance optimization.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16641078
Volume :
13
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Psychology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6c749f21bec74b37aaca0bb9db7778cc
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017675