Observing the Supernational Systemic World Order

Penal approaches in transnational law have basically focused on substantial rules and faced serious challenges of which the misleading conceptual agendas, fast and furious shifts in cultural and behavioral patterns of crime, and controversies about global mechanisms of normative description are remarkable. My paper suggests that the existing criminal mechanisms are, basically fostered by procedural policies without further references to the confusingly diversity of new crime patterns. Its central theme is to draw a reliable theoretical framework of a supranational network that acts upon procedural criminal rules. Flexibility and accountability in administrative policies and procedural standards should be patiently developed in relevant with the current penal findings. I argue that the successful implication and institutionalization of substantial norms in the supranational project is positively achievable through network assistance. In other words, the missing theorem or discourses that might address the substantial rules or be directed toward creating a fruitful debate that ends in normative penal standards for dealing global crimes must be reflected in a network of systemic cooperation. There will be also an argumentation regarding the need for a thematic exploration of substantial rules that would form the supranational network as conceptual approaches with priority over procedural mechanisms.