Back to Search Start Over

What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries

Authors :
Partha Basu
Martin McKee
Adriana Băban
Luke Vale
Marc Bardou
Ana Fernandes
Sadie Bell
Margarida Teixeira
Rebecca Moore
Nuno Lunet
David Ritchie
Romeu Mendes
Eric Lucas
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Rosa Legood
Berit Andersen
Diana Taut
Keitly Mensah
João Firmino-Machado
Mariana Amorim
Mette Tranberg
Laura Bonvicini
Li Sun
Anneli Uusküla
Pia Kirkegaard
Paola Mantellini
Ines Baia
Lise Rochaix
Camilla Fiorina
Luca Ghirotto
Anna Tisler
Wendy Yared
Firmino Machado
Rikke Buus Bøje
Raquel Rico Berrocal
Noemi Auzzi
Nicoleta Jiboc
Kerli Reintamm
Raya Michaylova
Yulia Panayotova
Tatyana Kotzeva
Anna Foss
Rachel Greenley
Letizia Bartolini
Giusy Iorio
Cláudia Gouvinhas
Florian Nicula
Alexandra Tolnai
Vanessa Moore
Isabel Mosquera Metcalfe
Violette Delisle
Irina Todorova
Raya Mihaylova
Helena Ros Comesana
Meritxel Mallafré-Larrosa
Ginevra Papi
Arianna Khatchadourian
Christiane Dascher-Nade
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 14, Iss 5 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2024.

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to map and compare stakeholders’ perceptions of barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women in seven European countries.Design In Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to participate to identify barriers towards participation in cervical cancer screening.Setting The study is nested in the European Union-funded project CBIG-SCREEN which aims to tackle inequity in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.Participants Participants represented micro-level stakeholders covering representatives of users, that is, vulnerable women, meso-level stakeholders covering healthcare professionals and social workers, and macro-level stakeholders covering programme managers and decision-makers.Methods Across the seven countries, 25 meetings in Collaborative User Boards with a duration of 2 hours took place between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were video recorded or audio recorded, transcribed and translated into English for a qualitative framework analysis.Results 120 participants took part in the Collaborative User Boards. Context-specific barriers were related to different healthcare systems and characteristics of vulnerable populations. In Romania and Bulgaria, the lack of a continuous screening effort and lack of ways to identify eligible women were identified as barriers for all women rather than being specific for women in vulnerable situations. The participants in Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy and Portugal identified providers’ lack of cultural and social sensitivity towards vulnerable women as barriers. In all countries, vulnerable women’s fear, shame and lack of priority to preventive healthcare were identified as psychological barriers.Conclusion The study provides an overview of stakeholders’ perceived barriers towards vulnerable women’s cervical cancer screening participation in seven European countries. The organisation of healthcare systems and the maturity of screening programmes differ between countries, while vulnerable women’s psychological barriers had several similarities.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
14
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6aa1dddfe3d94eb183c0aa3560e95737
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921