Back to Search Start Over

Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Improvement in Digital Positron Emission Tomography for Breast Cancer

Authors :
Mio Mori
Tomoyuki Fujioka
Mayumi Hara
Leona Katsuta
Yuka Yashima
Emi Yamaga
Ken Yamagiwa
Junichi Tsuchiya
Kumiko Hayashi
Yuichi Kumaki
Goshi Oda
Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
Iichiroh Onishi
Kazunori Kubota
Ukihide Tateishi
Source :
Diagnostics, Vol 13, Iss 4, p 794 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2023.

Abstract

We investigated whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography images restored via deep learning (DL) improved image quality and affected axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis diagnosis in patients with breast cancer. Using a five-point scale, two readers compared the image quality of DL-PET and conventional PET (cPET) in 53 consecutive patients from September 2020 to October 2021. Visually analyzed ipsilateral ALNs were rated on a three-point scale. The standard uptake values SUVmax and SUVpeak were calculated for breast cancer regions of interest. For “depiction of primary lesion”, reader 2 scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. For “noise”, “clarity of mammary gland”, and “overall image quality”, both readers scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. The SUVmax and SUVpeak for primary lesions and normal breasts were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET (p < 0.001). Considering the ALN metastasis scores 1 and 2 as negative and 3 as positive, the McNemar test revealed no significant difference between cPET and DL-PET scores for either reader (p = 0.250, 0.625). DL-PET improved visual image quality for breast cancer compared with cPET. SUVmax and SUVpeak were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET. DL-PET and cPET exhibited comparable diagnostic abilities for ALN metastasis.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Volume :
13
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Diagnostics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6a9696c3d0d74e71898b6e9eb59afe75
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040794