Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of representational competence in kinematics

Authors :
P. Klein
A. Müller
J. Kuhn
Source :
Physical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 13, Iss 1, p 010132 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
American Physical Society, 2017.

Abstract

A two-tier instrument for representational competence in the field of kinematics (KiRC) is presented, designed for a standard (1st year) calculus-based introductory mechanics course. It comprises 11 multiple choice (MC) and 7 multiple true-false (MTF) questions involving multiple representational formats, such as graphs, pictures, and formal (mathematical) expressions (1st tier). Furthermore, students express their answer confidence for selected items, providing additional information (2nd tier). Measurement characteristics of KiRC were assessed in a validation sample (pre- and post-test, N=83 and N=46, respectively), including usefulness for measuring learning gain. Validity is checked by interviews and by benchmarking KiRC against related measures. Values for item difficulty, discrimination, and consistency are in the desired ranges; in particular, a good reliability was obtained (KR20=0.86). Confidence intervals were computed and a replication study yielded values within the latter. For practical and research purposes, KiRC as a diagnostic tool goes beyond related extant instruments both for the representational formats (e.g., mathematical expressions) and for the scope of content covered (e.g., choice of coordinate systems). Together with the satisfactory psychometric properties it appears a versatile and reliable tool for assessing students’ representational competency in kinematics (and of its potential change). Confidence judgments add further information to the diagnostic potential of the test, in particular for representational misconceptions. Moreover, we present an analytic result for the question—arising from guessing correction or educational considerations—of how the total effect size (Cohen’s d) varies upon combination of two test components with known individual effect sizes, and then discuss the results in the case of KiRC (MC and MTF combination). The introduced method of test combination analysis can be applied to any test comprising two components for the purpose of finding effect size ranges.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24699896
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.67baa24c749adbd3fca0fd6450bef
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010132