Back to Search Start Over

International survey on invasive lobular breast cancer identifies priority research questions

Authors :
Steffi Oesterreich
Leigh Pate
Adrian V. Lee
Fangyuan Chen
Rachel C. Jankowitz
Rita Mukhtar
Otto Metzger
Matthew J. Sikora
Christopher I. Li
Christos Sotiriou
Osama S. Shah
Thijs Koorman
Gary Ulaner
Jorge S. Reis-Filho
Nancy M. Davidson
Karen Van Baelen
Laurie Hutcheson
Siobhan Freeney
Flora Migyanka
Claire Turner
Patrick Derksen
Todd Bear
Christine Desmedt
Source :
npj Breast Cancer, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Nature Portfolio, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract There is growing awareness of the unique etiology, biology, and clinical presentation of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC), but additional research is needed to ensure translation of findings into management and treatment guidelines. We conducted a survey with input from breast cancer physicians, laboratory-based researchers, and patients to analyze the current understanding of ILC, and identify consensus research questions. 1774 participants from 66 countries respondents self-identified as clinicians (N = 413), researchers (N = 376), and breast cancer patients and advocates (N = 1120), with some belonging to more than one category. The majority of physicians reported being very/extremely (41%) to moderately (42%) confident in describing the differences between ILC and invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST). Knowledge of histology was seen as important (73%) and as affecting treatment decisions (51%), and most agreed that refining treatment guidelines would be valuable (76%). 85% of clinicians have never powered a clinical trial to allow subset analysis for histological subtypes, but the majority would consider it, and would participate in an ILC clinical trials consortium. The majority of laboratory researchers, reported being and very/extremely (48%) to moderately (29%) confident in describing differences between ILC and NST. They reported that ILCs are inadequately presented in large genomic data sets, and that ILC models are insufficient. The majority have adequate access to tissue or blood from patients with ILC. The majority of patients and advocates (52%) thought that their health care providers did not sufficiently explain the unique features of ILC. They identified improvement of ILC screening/early detection, and identification of better imaging tools as top research priorities. In contrast, both researchers and clinicians identified understanding of endocrine resistance and identifying novel drugs that can be tested in clinical trials as top research priority. In summary, we have gathered information from an international community of physicians, researchers, and patients/advocates that we expect will lay the foundation for a community-informed collaborative research agenda, with the goal of improving management and personalizing treatment for patients with ILC.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23744677
Volume :
10
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
npj Breast Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.674206de519c4c9a91765a34839d5098
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00661-3