Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of turbulence measurements by a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar

Authors :
M. Mauder
M. Eggert
C. Gutsmuths
S. Oertel
P. Wilhelm
I. Voelksch
L. Wanner
J. Tambke
I. Bogoev
Source :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol 13, Pp 969-983 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Copernicus Publications, 2020.

Abstract

Accurate measurements of turbulence statistics in the atmosphere are important for eddy-covariance measurements, wind energy research, and the validation of atmospheric numerical models. Sonic anemometers are widely used for these applications. However, these instruments are prone to probe-induced flow distortion effects, and the magnitude of the resulting errors has been debated due to the lack of an absolute reference instrument under field conditions. Here, we present the results of an intercomparison experiment between a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar, which is inherently free of any flow distortion. This novel remote sensing instrument has otherwise very similar spatial and temporal sampling characteristics to the sonic anemometer and hence served as a reference for this comparison. The presented measurements were carried out over flat homogeneous terrain at a measurement height of 30 m. We provide a comparative statistical analysis of the resulting mean wind velocities, the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed and the friction velocity and investigate the reasons for the observed deviations based on the turbulence spectra and co-spectra. Our results show an agreement of the mean wind velocity measurements and the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed with a comparability of 0.082 and 0.020 m s−1, respectively. Biases for these two quantities were 0.003 and 0.012 m s−1, respectively. Slightly larger differences were observed for friction velocity. Analysis of the corresponding co-spectra showed that the CSAT3B underestimates this quantity systematically by about 3 % on average as a result of co-spectral losses in the frequency range between 0.1 and 5 s−1. We also found that an angle-of-attack-dependent transducer-shadowing correction does not improve the agreement between the CSAT3B and the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) lidar effectively.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18671381 and 18678548
Volume :
13
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.6334a17aaf33484aa28ddce1f3955112
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020