Back to Search Start Over

Clinical comparison of sub-mm high-resolution non-contrast coronary CMR angiography against coronary CT angiography in patients with low-intermediate risk of coronary artery disease: a single center trial

Authors :
Reza Hajhosseiny
Imran Rashid
Aurélien Bustin
Camila Munoz
Gastao Cruz
Muhummad Sohaib Nazir
Karine Grigoryan
Tevfik F. Ismail
Rebecca Preston
Radhouene Neji
Karl Kunze
Reza Razavi
Amedeo Chiribiri
Pier Giorgio Masci
Ronak Rajani
Claudia Prieto
René M. Botnar
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Background The widespread clinical application of coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) angiography (CMRA) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited due to low scan efficiency leading to prolonged and unpredictable acquisition times; low spatial-resolution; and residual respiratory motion artefacts resulting in limited image quality. To overcome these limitations, we have integrated highly undersampled acquisitions with image-based navigators and non-rigid motion correction to enable high resolution (sub-1 mm3) free-breathing, contrast-free 3D whole-heart coronary CMRA with 100% respiratory scan efficiency in a clinically feasible and predictable acquisition time. Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of this coronary CMRA framework against coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected CAD. Methods Consecutive patients (n = 50) with suspected CAD were examined on a 1.5T CMR scanner. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CMRA against coronary CTA for detecting a ≥ 50% reduction in luminal diameter. Results The 50 recruited patients (55 ± 9 years, 33 male) completed coronary CMRA in 10.7 ± 1.4 min. Twelve (24%) had significant CAD on coronary CTA. Coronary CMRA obtained diagnostic image quality in 95% of all, 97% of proximal, 97% of middle and 90% of distal coronary segments. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were: per patient (100%, 74%, 55%, 100% and 80%), per vessel (81%, 88%, 46%, 97% and 88%) and per segment (76%, 95%, 44%, 99% and 94%) respectively. Conclusions The high diagnostic image quality and diagnostic performance of coronary CMRA compared against coronary CTA demonstrates the potential of coronary CMRA as a robust and safe non-invasive alternative for excluding significant disease in patients at low-intermediate risk of CAD.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532429X
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5fb8abca236746698fe5a4a8a3c3ce68
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00758-9