Back to Search Start Over

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy: A propensity score–matched analysisCentral MessagePerspective

Authors :
Julio Sesma, MD
Sergio Bolufer, MD, PhD
Antonio García-Valentín, MD, PhD
Raúl Embún, MD, PhD
Íker Javier López, MD, PhD
Nicolás Moreno-Mata, MD, PhD
Unai Jiménez, MD
Florentino Hernando Trancho, MD, PhD
Antonio Eduardo Martín-Ucar, MD
Juana Gallar, MD, PhD
Raul Embun
Iñigo Royo-Crespo
José Luis Recuero Díaz
Sergio Bolufer
Julio Sesma
Sergi Call
Miguel Congregado
David Gómez-de Antonio
Marcelo F. Jimenez
Nicolas Moreno-Mata
Borja Aguinagalde
Sergio Amor-Alonso
Miguel Jesús Arrarás
Ana Isabel Blanco Orozco
Marc Boada
Alberto Cabañero Sánchez
Isabel Cal Vázquez
Ángel Cilleruelo Ramos
Silvana Crowley Carrasco
Elena Fernández-Martín
Santiago García-Barajas
Maria Dolores García-Jiménez
Jose María García-Prim
Jose Alberto Garcia-Salcedo
Juan José Gelbenzu-Zazpe
Carlos Fernando Giraldo-Ospina
María Teresa Gómez Hernández
Jorge Hernández
Jennifer D. Illana Wolf
Alberto Jauregui Abularach
Unai Jiménez
Iker López Sanz
Néstor J. Martínez-Hernández
Elisabeth Martínez-Téllez
Lucía Milla Collado
Roberto Mongil Poce
Francisco Javier Moradiellos-Díez
Ramón Moreno-Balsalobre
Sergio B. Moreno Merino
Carme Obiols
Florencio Quero-Valenzuela
María Elena Ramírez-Gil
Ricard Ramos-Izquierdo
Eduardo Rivo
Alberto Rodríguez-Fuster
Rafael Rojo-Marcos
David Sanchez-Lorente
Laura Sanchez Moreno
Carlos Simón
Juan Carlos Trujillo-Reyes
Florentino Hernando Trancho
Source :
JTCVS Open, Vol 9, Iss , Pp 268-278 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative complications, perioperative course, and survival among patients from the multicentric Spanish Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Group database who received video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy. Methods: From December 2016 to March 2018, a total of 2250 patients were collected from 33 centers. Overall analysis (video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy = 2070; video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy = 180) and propensity score–matched adjusted analysis (video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy = 97; video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy = 97) were performed to compare postoperative results. Kaplan–Meier and competing risks method were used to compare survival. Results: In the overall analysis, video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy showed a lower incidence of respiratory complications (relative risk, 0.56; confidence interval, 0.37-0.83; P = .002), lower postoperative prolonged air leak (relative risk, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.78; P = .003), and shorter median postoperative stay (4.8 vs 6.2 days; P = .004) than video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. After propensity score–matched analysis, prolonged air leak remained significantly lower in video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy (relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.89; P = .02). Kaplan–Meier and competing risk curves showed no differences during the 3-year follow-up (median follow-up in months: 24.4; interquartile range, 20.8-28.3) in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.7; P = .2), tumor progression–related mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-1.57; P = .2), and disease-free survival (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.51; P = .4) between groups. Conclusions: Video-assisted thoracic surgery segmentectomy showed results similar to lobectomy in terms of postoperative outcomes and midterm survival. In addition, a lower incidence of prolonged air leak was found in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26662736
Volume :
9
Issue :
268-278
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
JTCVS Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5e8996c250b4d3db89116838a60d825
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.009