Back to Search Start Over

Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is associated with less cardiac toxicity than combination therapy.

Authors :
Eugene B Cone
Lorine Haeuser
Stephen W Reese
Maya Marchese
David-Dan Nguyen
Junaid Nabi
Wesley H Chou
Joachim Noldus
Rana R McKay
Kerry Laing Kilbridge
Quoc-Dien Trinh
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss 11, p e0272022 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2022.

Abstract

BackgroundTreatment options for many cancers include immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and combination therapy with impressive clinical benefit across cancers. We sought to define the comparative cardiac risks of ICI combination and monotherapy.MethodsWe used VigiBase, the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, to identify cardiac ADRs (cADRs), such as carditis, heart failure, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and valvular dysfunction, related to ICI therapy. To explore possible relationships, we used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a proxy of relative risk. A lower bound of a 95% confidence interval of ROR > 1 reflects a disproportionality signal that more ADRs are observed than expected due to chance.ResultsWe found 2278 cADR for ICI monotherapy and 353 for ICI combination therapy. Combination therapy was associated with significantly higher odds of carditis (ROR 6.9, 95% CI: 5.6-8.3) versus ICI monotherapy (ROR 5.0, 95% CI: 4.6-5.4). Carditis in ICI combination therapy was fatal in 23.4% of reported ADRs, compared to 15.8% for ICI monotherapy (P = 0.058).ConclusionsUsing validated pharmacovigilance methodology, we found increased odds of carditis for all ICI therapies, with the highest odds for combination therapy. Given the substantial risk of severe ADR and death, clinicians should consider these findings when prescribing checkpoint inhibitors.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine
Science

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
17
Issue :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5d43bc54a9b14b4ca67b3b9aa480b0a6
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272022