Back to Search Start Over

Association between culture and the preference for, and perceptions of, 11 routes of medicine administration: A survey in 21 countries and regions

Authors :
Sudaxshina Murdan
Li Wei
Diana A. van Riet-Nales
Abyot Endale Gurmu
Stella Folajole Usifoh
Adriana-Elena Tăerel
Ayca Yıldız-Peköz
Dušanka Krajnović
Lilian M. Azzopardi
Tina Brock
Ana I. Fernandes
André Luis Souza dos Santos
Berko Panyin Anto
Thibault Vallet
Eunkyung Euni Lee
Kyeong Hye Jeong
Marwan Akel
Eliza Tam
Daisy Volmer
Tawfik Douss
Sharvari Shukla
Shigeo Yamamura
Xiaoe Lou
Bauke H.G. van Riet
Cyril O. Usifoh
Mahama Duwiejua
Fabrice Ruiz
Adrian Furnham
Source :
Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, Vol 12, Iss , Pp 100378- (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2023.

Abstract

Medicines can be taken by various routes of administration. These can impact the effects and perceptions of medicines. The literature about individuals' preferences for and perceptions of the different routes of administration is sparse, but indicates a potential influence of culture. Our aim was to determine: (i) any association between one's culture and one's preferred route of medicine administration and (ii) individual perceptions of pain, efficacy, speed of action and acceptability when medicines are swallowed or placed in the mouth, under the tongue, in the nose, eye, ear, lungs, rectum, vagina, on the skin, or areinjected.A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey of adults was conducted in 21 countries and regions of the world, namely, Tunisia, Ghana, Nigeria, Turkey, Ethiopia, Lebanon, Malta, Brazil, Great Britain, United States, India, Serbia, Romania, Portugal, France, Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, mainland China and Estonia, using the Inglehart–Welzel cultural map to ensure coverage across all cultures. Participants scored the pain/discomfort, efficacy, speed of onset and acceptability of the different routes of medicine administration and stated their preferred route. Demographic information was collected.A total of 4435 participants took part in the survey. Overall, the oral route was the most preferred route, followed by injection, while the rectal route was the least preferred. While the oral route was the most preferred in all cultures, the percentage of participants selecting this route varied, from 98% in Protestant Europe to 50% in the African-Islamic culture. A multinomial logistic regression model revealed a number of predictors for the preferred route. Injections were favoured in the Baltic, South Asia, Latin America and African-Islamic cultures while dermal administration was favoured in Catholic Europe, Baltic and Latin America cultures. A marked association was found between culture and the preference for, and perceptions of the different routes by which medicines are taken. This applied to even the least favoured routes (vaginal and rectal). Only women were asked about the vaginal route, and our data shows that the vaginal route was slightly more popular than the rectal one.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26672766
Volume :
12
Issue :
100378-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5d141f832bfd44909efd872992c24ef5
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100378