Back to Search Start Over

Meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitor-dependent maintenance treatment for multiple myeloma a systematic review

Authors :
Xin-xin Yang
Guoli Yao
Yujing Yang
Yahui Han
Lin Yang
Yuefeng Zhang
Source :
Heliyon, Vol 10, Iss 16, Pp e36311- (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2024.

Abstract

Background: Even with significant advancements, treating multiple myeloma (MM) remains difficult. At present, the main treatment methods include combined treatment of stem cell transplantation, drug treatment, etc. With the clarification of the molecular biological mechanism of MM, as well as the in-depth study of the internal signal of myeloma cells and the microenvironment of MM patients, more and more new drugs targeting myeloma and microenvironment are gradually used in clinical maintenance treatment, such as inhibit the proteosome: ixazomib, bortezomib and carfilzomib, immune - modulators: thalidomide and lenalidomide, monoclonal antibodies, etc. have made great progress in MM maintenance treatment. With the continuous development of proteasome inhibitor maintenance treatment in MM, the prognosis of the disease has been significantly improved. Our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse reactions of proteasome inhibitors in maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma, providing new ideas for clinical medication. Methods: Four databases containing randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitors in the maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma are retrieved by the computer. Once the quality of the literature has been thoroughly evaluated, run the data via the RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Eventually 8 studies were added in this systematic review. Compared with the placebo group, proteasome inhibitor in maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma patients with prolonged the survival without progression and overall existence. 5 studies reported the peripheral neuropathy of multiple myeloma in the treatment group compared to placebo group, which was remarkably greater (OR: 1.98; 95 % Cl: 1.35, 2.92; P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24058440
Volume :
10
Issue :
16
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Heliyon
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5a0a199dcab945688709c728f4a0ff3b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36311