Back to Search Start Over

Using Deep Learning Radiomics to Distinguish Cognitively Normal Adults at Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease From Normal Control: An Exploratory Study Based on Structural MRI

Authors :
Jiehui Jiang
Jieming Zhang
Zhuoyuan Li
Lanlan Li
Bingcang Huang
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Source :
Frontiers in Medicine, Vol 9 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2022.

Abstract

ObjectivesWe proposed a novel deep learning radiomics (DLR) method to distinguish cognitively normal adults at risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from normal control based on T1-weighted structural MRI images.MethodsIn this study, we selected MRI data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Database (ADNI), which included 417 cognitively normal adults. These subjects were divided into 181 individuals at risk of Alzheimer’s disease (preAD group) and 236 normal control individuals (NC group) according to standard uptake ratio >1.18 calculated by amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET). We further divided the preaAD group into APOE+ and APOE− subgroups according to whether APOE ε4 was positive or not. All data sets were divided into one training/validation group and one independent test group. The proposed DLR method included three steps: (1) the pre-training of basic deep learning (DL) models, (2) the extraction, selection and fusion of DLR features, and (3) classification. The support vector machine (SVM) was used as the classifier. In the comparative experiments, we compared our proposed DLR method with three existing models: hippocampal model, clinical model, and traditional radiomics model. Ten-fold cross-validation was performed with 100 time repetitions.ResultsThe DLR method achieved the best classification performance between preAD and NC than other models with an accuracy of 89.85% ± 1.12%. In comparison, the accuracies of the other three models were 72.44% ± 1.37%, 82.00% ± 4.09% and 79.65% ± 2.21%. In addition, the DLR model also showed the best classification performance (85.45% ± 9.04% and 92.80% ± 2.61%) in the subgroup experiment.ConclusionThe results showed that the DLR method provided a potentially clinical value to distinguish preAD from NC.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2296858X
Volume :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.587a22c85d4828ae9f63dcddf11c61
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.894726