Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of serine protease produced by Bacillus licheniformis DSM 19670 (Ronozyme® ProAct) for chickens for fattening (DSM Nutritional Products Ltd.)

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Vasileios Bampidis
Giovanna Azimonti
Maria de Lourdes Bastos
Henrik Christensen
Birgit Dusemund
Maryline Kouba
Mojca Fašmon Durjava
Marta López‐Alonso
Secundino López Puente
Francesca Marcon
Baltasar Mayo
Alena Pechová
Mariana Petkova
Fernando Ramos
Yolanda Sanz
Roberto Edoardo Villa
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Boet Glandorf
Lieve Herman
Miguel Prieto Maradona
Maria Saarela
Montserrat Anguita
Jaume Galobart
Orsolya Holczknecht
Paola Manini
Fabiola Pizzo
Jordi Tarrés‐Call
Elisa Pettenati
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 19, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Ronozyme® ProAct is the trade name of the feed additive under assessment and contains serine protease produced by a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis. Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Ronozyme® ProAct when used as a zootechnical additive for chickens for fattening. The additive is available in coated thermotolerant granulated and liquid forms (Ronozyme® ProAct CT/L). The production strain and its recombinant DNA were not detected in an intermediate concentrated product used to produce the final formulations. The final products do not trigger a safety concern with regard to the genetic modification. Based on the results obtained in a tolerance study in chickens for fattening and the data from a subchronic oral toxicity study the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe for chickens for fattening. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the use of Ronozyme® ProAct CT/L as a feed additive gives rise to no concern for consumers and for the environment. The additive, in either form, is not an eye irritant but should be considered a skin irritant. In the absence of data, no conclusions on the skin sensitisation potential can be reached. Owing to the proteinaceous nature of the active substance it should be considered a respiratory sensitiser. The FEEDAP Panel also concluded that the additive has the potential to be efficacious at 15,000 PROT/kg compound feed for chickens for fattening.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
19
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.5749c5738cb742edab9592d11cf36f3f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6448