Back to Search Start Over

Alcohol-based surgical hand preparation: translating scientific evidence into clinical practice

Authors :
Gilberto G. Gaspar
Mayra G. Menegueti
Ana Elisa R. Lopes
Roberto O. C. Santos
Thamiris R. de Araújo
Aline Nassiff
Lécio R. Ferreira
Maria Eulalia L. V. Dallora
Silvia R. M. S. Canini
Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues
Source :
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
BMC, 2018.

Abstract

Abstract Background Although alcohol-based surgical hand preparation offers potential advantages over the traditional surgical scrubbing technique, implementing it may be challenging due to resistance of surgeons in changing their practice. We aimed to implement alcohol-based surgical hand preparation in the hospital setting evaluating the impact of that on the quality and duration of the procedure, as well as on the prevention of surgical site infections. Methods A quasi-experimental study conducted at a tertiary-care university hospital from April 01 to November 01, 2017. Participants were cardiac and orthopedic surgical teams (n = 56) and patients operated by them (n = 231). Intervention consisted of making alcohol-based handrub available in the operating room, convincing and training surgical teams for using it, promoting direct observation of surgical hand preparation, and providing aggregated feedback on the quality of the preparation. The primary study outcome was the quality of the surgical hand preparation, inferred by the compliance with each one of the steps predicted in the World Health Organization (WHO) technique, evaluated through direct observation. Secondary study outcome was the patient’s individual probability of developing surgical site infection in both study periods. We used the Wilcoxon for paired samples and McNemar’s test to assess the primary study outcome and we build a logistic regression model to assess the secondary outcome. Results We observed 534 surgical hand preparation events. Among 33 participants with full data available for both study periods, we observed full compliance with all the steps predicted in the WHO technique in 0.03% (1/33) of them in the pre-intervention period and in 36.36% (12/33) of them in the intervention period (OR:12.0, 95% CI: 2. 4-59.2, p = 0.002). Compared to the pre-intervention period, the intervention reduced the duration of the preparation (4.8 min vs 2.7 min, respectively; p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20472994
Volume :
7
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.56fb1bd2ebce4b40b907eb977afb9dcf
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0372-7