Back to Search Start Over

Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Authors :
Li-Ting Liu
Yu-Jing Liang
Shan-Shan Guo
Hao-Yuan Mo
Ling Guo
Yue-Feng Wen
Hao-Jun Xie
Qing-Nan Tang
Xue-Song Sun
Sai-Lan Liu
Xiao-Yun Li
Jin-Hao Yang
Zhen-Chong Yang
Lin-Quan Tang
Qiu-Yan Chen
Hai-Qiang Mai
Source :
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, Vol 12 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
SAGE Publishing, 2020.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the efficiency and toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy (RT) in different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: A total of 1814 eligible patients with stage II–IVB disease treated with CCRT or IC plus RT were included. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test. Results: Nomograms were developed to predict OS, PFS and DMFS (C-index: 0.71, 0.70 and 0.71, respectively). Patients were then divided into three different risk groups based on the scores calculated by the nomogram for OS. In the low and intermediate-risk group, no significant survival differences were observed between patients treated with IC plus RT alone and CCRT (5-year OS, 97.3% versus 95.6%, p = 0.642 and 87.6% versus 89.7%, p = 0.381, respectively; PFS, 95.9% versus 95.6%, p = 0.325 and 87.6% versus 89.0%, p = 0.160, respectively; DMFS, 97.2% versus 94.8%, p = 0.339 and 87.2% versus 89.3%, p = 0.628, respectively). However, in the high-risk group, IC plus RT displayed an unfavorable 5-year OS (71.0% versus 77.2%, p = 0.022) and PFS (69.4.0% versus 75.4%, p = 0.019) compared with CCRT. A significantly higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was documented in patients treated with CCRT than in those treated with IC plus RT in all risk groups ( p = 0.040). Conclusion: IC followed by RT represents an alternative treatment strategy to CCRT for patients with low and intermediate-risk NPC, but it is not recommended for patients with high-risk NPC.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17588359
Volume :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.55ec4809aab74a53a45bf2c6c6651510
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920928214