Back to Search Start Over

Electromechanical and Robotic Devices for Gait and Balance Rehabilitation of Children with Neurological Disability: A Systematic Review

Authors :
Nicola Valè
Marialuisa Gandolfi
Laura Vignoli
Anita Botticelli
Federico Posteraro
Giovanni Morone
Antonella Dell’Orco
Eleonora Dimitrova
Elisa Gervasoni
Michela Goffredo
Jacopo Zenzeri
Arianna Antonini
Carla Daniele
Paolo Benanti
Paolo Boldrini
Donatella Bonaiuti
Enrico Castelli
Francesco Draicchio
Vincenzo Falabella
Silvia Galeri
Francesca Gimigliano
Mauro Grigioni
Stefano Mazzon
Franco Molteni
Maurizio Petrarca
Alessandro Picelli
Michele Senatore
Giuseppe Turchetti
Eugenio Guglielmelli
Nicola Petrone
Loris Pignolo
Giulia Sgubin
Nicola Smania
Loredana Zollo
Stefano Mazzoleni
Source :
Applied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 24, p 12061 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2021.

Abstract

In the last two decades, a growing interest has been focused on gait and balance robot-assisted rehabilitation in children with neurological disabilities. Robotic devices allow the implementation of intensive, task-specific training fostering functional recovery and neuroplasticity phenomena. However, limited attention has been paid to the protocols used in this research framework. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the existing literature on robotic systems for the rehabilitation of gait and balance in children with neurological disabilities and their rehabilitation applications. The literature search was carried out independently and synchronously by three authors on the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PeDro, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The data collected included three subsections referring to clinical, technical, and regulatory aspects. Thirty-one articles out of 81 found on the primary literature search were included in the systematic review. Most studies involved children with cerebral palsy. Only one-third of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Overall, 17 devices (nine end-effector systems and eight exoskeletons) were investigated, among which only 4 (24%) were bore the CE mark. Studies differ on rehabilitation protocols duration, intensity, and outcome measures. Future research should improve both rehabilitation protocols’ and devices’ descriptions.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20763417
Volume :
11
Issue :
24
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Applied Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.53df72d5bd1140769965d51fec226eeb
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/app112412061