Back to Search Start Over

Durvalumab as monotherapy and in combination therapy in patients with lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia: The FUSION NHL 001 trial

Authors :
Carla Casulo
Armando Santoro
Guillaume Cartron
Kiyoshi Ando
Javier Munoz
Steven Le Gouill
Koji Izutsu
Simon Rule
Pieternella Lugtenburg
Jia Ruan
Luca Arcaini
Marie‐Laure Casadebaig
Brian Fox
Nurgul Kilavuz
Nils Rettby
Justine Dell'Aringa
Lilia Taningco
Richard Delarue
Myron Czuczman
Thomas Witzig
Source :
Cancer Reports, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors may represent a promising strategy for boosting immune responses and improving the antitumor activity of standard therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. Aims Phase 1/2 FUSION NHL 001 was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of durvalumab, an anti‐programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) antibody, combined with standard‐of‐care therapies for lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Methods and Results The primary endpoints were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of the drugs used in combination with durvalumab (durvalumab was administered at the previously recommended dose of 1500 mg every 4 weeks) and to assess safety and tolerability. Patients were enrolled into one of four arms: durvalumab monotherapy (Arm D) or durvalumab in combination with lenalidomide ± rituximab (Arm A), ibrutinib (Arm B), or rituximab ± bendamustine (Arm C). A total of 106 patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma were enrolled. All but two patients experienced at least one treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE); those not experiencing a TEAE were in Arm C (diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) and Arm D (DLBCL during the durvalumab monotherapy treatment period). No new safety signals were identified, and TEAEs were consistent with the respective safety profiles for each study treatment. Across the study, patients with follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 23) had an overall response rate (ORR) of 59%; ORR among DLBCL patients (n = 37) was 18%. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed that response to durvalumab monotherapy or combination therapy was associated with higher interferon‐γ signature scores in patients with FL (p = .02). Conclusion Durvalumab as monotherapy or in combination is tolerable but requires close monitoring. The high rate of TEAEs during this study may reflect on the difficulty in combining durvalumab with full doses of other agents. Durvalumab alone or in combination appeared to add limited benefit to therapy.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25738348
Volume :
6
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Cancer Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.53982eb6c7094c0dbc546b6a65f550a0
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1662