Back to Search Start Over

Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach

Authors :
Cheryl T. Lee
Nihal E. Mohamed
Sailaja Pisipati
Qainat N. Shah
Piyush K. Agarwal
Tracy M. Downs
Michael Droller
Scott M. Gilbert
Heather H. Goltz
Simon J. Hall
Mohamed Hendawi
Jean Hoffman-Censits
Michael O’Donnell
Matthew Kaag
Lawrence I. Karsh
Wassim Kassouf
Diane Z. Quale
Arthur Sagalowsky
Gary D. Steinberg
David M. Latini
Source :
BMC Health Services Research, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
BMC, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract Background, context and purpose In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings. Methods In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses. Results During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59 BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3 min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences. Conclusions Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs. Trial registration Study HUM00056082.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726963
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Health Services Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.53497c1ceff945dd872b891ad5999e6e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7