Back to Search Start Over

Adherence to guideline-directed medical and device Therapy in outpAtients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The ATA study

Authors :
Umut Kocabaş
Tarık Kıvrak
Gülsüm Meral Yılmaz Öztekin
Veysel Ozan Tanık
Ibrahim Halil Özdemir
Ersin Kaya
Elif Ilkay Yüce
Fulya Avcı Demir
Mustafa Doğduş
Meltem Altınsoy
Songül Üstündağ
Ferhat Özyurtlu
Uğur Karagöz
Alper Karakuş
Örsan Deniz Urgun
Ümit Yaşar Sinan
Inan Mutlu
Taner Şen
Mehmet Ali Astarcıoğlu
Mustafa Kınık
Özge Özden Tok
Begüm Uygur
Mehtap Yeni
Bahadır Alan
Onur Dalgıç
Çağla Sarıtürk
Hakan Altay
Seçkin Pehlivanoğlu
Source :
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 32-40 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
KARE Publishing, 2020.

Abstract

Objective: Despite recommendations from heart failure guidelines on the use of pharmacologic and device therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), important inconsistencies in guideline adherence persist in practice. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to guideline-directed medical and device therapy for the treatment of patients with chronic HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%). Methods: The Adherence to guideline-directed medical and device Therapy in outpAtients with HFrEF (ATA) study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in 24 centers from January 2019 to June 2019. Results: The study included 1462 outpatients (male: 70.1%, mean age: 67+-11 years, mean LVEF: 30%+-6%) with chronic HFrEF. Renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradin were used in 78.2%, 90.2%, 55.4%, and 12.1% of patients, respectively. The proportion of patients receiving target doses of medical treatments was 24.6% for RAS inhibitors, 9.9% for beta-blockers, and 10.5% for MRAs. Among patients who met the criteria for implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), only 16.9% of patients received an ICD (167 of 983) and 34% (95 of 279) of patients underwent CRT (95 of 279). Conclusion: The ATA study shows that most HFrEF outpatients receive RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers but not MRAs or ivabradin when the medical reasons for nonuse, such as drug intolerance or contraindications, are taken into account. In addition, most eligible patients with HFrEF do not receive target doses of pharmacological treatments or guideline-recommended device therapy.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21492263
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.50afd8da91ca4e20b7154d9d7b201bbe
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.91771