Back to Search Start Over

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase from genetically modified Aspergillus niger strain XYL

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF)
Vittorio Silano
Claudia Bolognesi
Laurence Castle
Jean‐Pierre Cravedi
Paul Fowler
Roland Franz
Konrad Grob
Rainer Gürtler
Trine Husøy
Sirpa Kärenlampi
Wim Mennes
Maria Rosaria Milana
André Penninks
Andrew Smith
Maria deFátima Tavares Poças
Christina Tlustos
Detlef Wölfle
Holger Zorn
Corina‐Aurelia Zugravu
Andrew Chesson
Boet Glandorf
Lieve Hermann
Klaus‐Dieter Jany
Francesca Marcon
Davor Želježic
Margarita Aguilera‐Gomez
Magdalena Andryszkiewicz
Davide Arcella
Natalia Kovalkovicova
Yi Liu
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 15, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Wiley, 2017.

Abstract

Abstract The food enzyme considered in this opinion is an endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) produced with a genetically modified strain of Aspergillus niger. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme contains neither the production organism nor recombinant DNA. The endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase is intended to be used in baking processes. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the respective food process, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated on the basis of individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database. This exposure estimate is below 0.013 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. No safety concerns were identified in relation to the genetic modifications performed, the manufacturing process, the compositional and biochemical data provided, allergenicity and exposure assessments. The allergenicity was evaluated by comparing the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens; no match was found. The Panel considered that the likelihood of allergic reactions to dietary intake of endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase is low and, therefore, does not give rise to safety concerns. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rodents. A no observed adverse effect level was derived (4,095 and 4,457 mg TOS/kg bw per day for males and females, respectively), which, compared with the dietary exposure, results in a sufficiently high margin of exposure. However, the genotoxicity data were incomplete. Due to the absence of the recommended combination of microbial strains used in the Ames test (i.e. lack of Salmonella Typhimurium TA102 and Escherichia coli WP2), no conclusions can be drawn on potential DNA oxidising or cross‐linking mechanisms giving rise to gene mutations. Consequently, no final conclusions can be drawn on genotoxicity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
15
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.50aede254cc4cb7bffc55c781cf6f51
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4755