Back to Search Start Over

Clinical recommendations for dry powder inhaler use in the management of COPD in primary care

Authors :
Marika T. Leving
Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
Joyce van Cooten
Jaime Correia de Sousa
Biljana Cvetkovski
Richard Dekhuijzen
Lars Dijk
Marina Garcia Pardo
Asparuh Gardev
Radosław Gawlik
Iris van der Ham
Ymke Janse
Federico Lavorini
Tiago Maricoto
Jiska Meijer
Boyd Metz
David Price
Miguel Roman-Rodriguez
Kirsten Schuttel
Nilouq Stoker
Ioanna Tsiligianni
Omar Usmani
Rachel Emerson-Stadler
Janwillem W. H. Kocks
Source :
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, Vol 32, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Nature Portfolio, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Over 1400 patients using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to deliver COPD maintenance therapies were recruited across Europe and Australia. Their peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was measured, inhaler technique was observed, and adherence to treatment assessed. From relating the findings with patient health status, and thereby identifying critical errors, key clinical recommendations for primary care clinicians were determined, namely – measure PIF before prescribing a DPI to ensure inhalation manoeuvre ability is well-matched with the device. Some patients could benefit from inhalation training whereas others should have their DPI changed for one better suited to their inspiratory ability or alternatively be prescribed an active device (such as a soft mist inhaler or pressurized metered dose inhaler). Observing the inhalation technique was valuable however this misses suboptimal PIF (approaching one fourth of patients with a satisfactory observed manoeuvre had a suboptimal PIF for their DPI). Assess adherence as deliberate non-adherence can point to a mismatch between a patient and their inhaler (deliberate non-adherence was significantly associated with PIFs below the minimum for the DPI). In-person observation of inhalation technique was found to be inferior to video rating based on device-specific checklists. Where video assessments are not possible, observation training for healthcare professionals would therefore be valuable particularly to improve the ability to identify the critical errors associated with health status namely ‘teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece’, ‘breathe in’ and ‘breathing out calmly after inhalation’. However, it is recommended that observation alone should not replace PIF measurement in the DPI selection process. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 .

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20551010
Volume :
32
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4f500578dcd4481a7fb5890a2bc10d5
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-022-00318-3