Back to Search Start Over

Highly Accurate Experimental Heave Decay Tests with a Floating Sphere: A Public Benchmark Dataset for Model Validation of Fluid–Structure Interaction

Authors :
Morten Bech Kramer
Jacob Andersen
Sarah Thomas
Flemming Buus Bendixen
Harry Bingham
Robert Read
Nikolaj Holk
Edward Ransley
Scott Brown
Yi-Hsiang Yu
Thanh Toan Tran
Josh Davidson
Csaba Horvath
Carl-Erik Janson
Kim Nielsen
Claes Eskilsson
Source :
Energies, Vol 14, Iss 2, p 269 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2021.

Abstract

Highly accurate and precise heave decay tests on a sphere with a diameter of 300 mm were completed in a meticulously designed test setup in the wave basin in the Ocean and Coastal Engineering Laboratory at Aalborg University, Denmark. The tests were dedicated to providing a rigorous benchmark dataset for numerical model validation. The sphere was ballasted to half submergence, thereby floating with the waterline at the equator when at rest in calm water. Heave decay tests were conducted, wherein the sphere was held stationary and dropped from three drop heights: a small drop height, which can be considered a linear case, a moderately nonlinear case, and a highly nonlinear case with a drop height from a position where the whole sphere was initially above the water. The precision of the heave decay time series was calculated from random and systematic standard uncertainties. At a 95% confidence level, uncertainties were found to be very low—on average only about 0.3% of the respective drop heights. Physical parameters of the test setup and associated uncertainties were quantified. A test case was formulated that closely represents the physical tests, enabling the reader to do his/her own numerical tests. The paper includes a comparison of the physical test results to the results from several independent numerical models based on linear potential flow, fully nonlinear potential flow, and the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations. A high correlation between physical and numerical test results is shown. The physical test results are very suitable for numerical model validation and are public as a benchmark dataset.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19961073
Volume :
14
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Energies
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4ef6078f0844caa186b24bef6b03b1
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020269