Back to Search Start Over

Evaluating Differences in Whole Blood, Serum, and Urine Screening Tests for Zika Virus, Puerto Rico, USA, 2016

Authors :
Asher Y. Rosinger
Samantha M. Olson
Sascha R. Ellington
Janice Perez-Padilla
Regina M. Simeone
Caitlin S. Pedati
Betsy A. Schroeder
Gilberto A. Santiago
Freddy A. Medina
Jorge L. Muñoz-Jordán
Laura E. Adams
Romeo R. Galang
Miguel Valencia-Prado
Sonia Bakkour
Candimar Colón
Mary Goodwin
Dana Meaney-Delman
Jennifer S. Read
Lyle R. Petersen
Denise J. Jamieson
Carmen C. Deseda
Margaret A. Honein
Brenda Rivera-García
Carrie K. Shapiro-Mendoza
Source :
Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol 27, Iss 5, Pp 1505-1508 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021.

Abstract

We evaluated nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for Zika virus on whole-blood specimens compared with NAAT on serum and urine specimens among asymptomatic pregnant women during the 2015–2016 Puerto Rico Zika outbreak. Using NAAT, more infections were detected in serum and urine than in whole blood specimens.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10806040 and 10806059
Volume :
27
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4e947a69f40d4069b2216024248145ae
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2705.203960