Back to Search Start Over

Unsupervised meta-clustering identifies risk clusters in acute myeloid leukemia based on clinical and genetic profiles

Authors :
Jan-Niklas Eckardt
Christoph Röllig
Klaus Metzeler
Peter Heisig
Sebastian Stasik
Julia-Annabell Georgi
Frank Kroschinsky
Friedrich Stölzel
Uwe Platzbecker
Karsten Spiekermann
Utz Krug
Jan Braess
Dennis Görlich
Cristina Sauerland
Bernhard Woermann
Tobias Herold
Wolfgang Hiddemann
Carsten Müller-Tidow
Hubert Serve
Claudia D. Baldus
Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart
Martin Kaufmann
Stefan W. Krause
Mathias Hänel
Wolfgang E. Berdel
Christoph Schliemann
Jiri Mayer
Maher Hanoun
Johannes Schetelig
Karsten Wendt
Martin Bornhäuser
Christian Thiede
Jan Moritz Middeke
Source :
Communications Medicine, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Nature Portfolio, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background Increasingly large and complex biomedical data sets challenge conventional hypothesis-driven analytical approaches, however, data-driven unsupervised learning can detect inherent patterns in such data sets. Methods While unsupervised analysis in the medical literature commonly only utilizes a single clustering algorithm for a given data set, we developed a large-scale model with 605 different combinations of target dimensionalities as well as transformation and clustering algorithms and subsequent meta-clustering of individual results. With this model, we investigated a large cohort of 1383 patients from 59 centers in Germany with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia for whom 212 clinical, laboratory, cytogenetic and molecular genetic parameters were available. Results Unsupervised learning identifies four distinct patient clusters, and statistical analysis shows significant differences in rate of complete remissions, event-free, relapse-free and overall survival between the four clusters. In comparison to the standard-of-care hypothesis-driven European Leukemia Net (ELN2017) risk stratification model, we find all three ELN2017 risk categories being represented in all four clusters in varying proportions indicating unappreciated complexity of AML biology in current established risk stratification models. Further, by using assigned clusters as labels we subsequently train a supervised model to validate cluster assignments on a large external multicenter cohort of 664 intensively treated AML patients. Conclusions Dynamic data-driven models are likely more suitable for risk stratification in the context of increasingly complex medical data than rigid hypothesis-driven models to allow for a more personalized treatment allocation and gain novel insights into disease biology.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2730664X
Volume :
3
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Communications Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4960d518e3d43029bd21cdce38e327f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00298-6