Back to Search Start Over

A Nationwide Retrospective Study of Opioid Management Patterns in 2,468 Patients with Spinal Pain in Korea

Authors :
Sung-Soo Chung
Chun-Kun Park
Kyu-Jung Cho
Kyoung Hyo Choi
Jin-Hyok Kim
Sung-Bum Kim
Sung-Uk Kuh
Jae Chul Lee
Jae Hyup Lee
Kyu-Yeol Lee
Sun-Ho Lee
Seong-Hwan Moon
Si-Young Park
Jae Hang Shim
Byung-Chul Son
Myung Ha Yoon
Hye-Jeong Park
Source :
Asian Spine Journal, Vol 10, Iss 6, Pp 1122-1131 (2016)
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Korean Spine Society, 2016.

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective patient data collection and investigator survey.PurposeTo investigate patterns of opioid treatment for pain caused by spinal disorders in Korea.Overview of LiteratureOpioid analgesic prescription and adequacy of consumption measures in Korea have markedly increased in the past decade, suggesting changing patterns in pain management practice; however, there is lack of integrated data specific to Korean population.MethodsPatient data were collected from medical records at 34 university hospitals in Korea. Outpatients receiving opioids for pain caused by spinal disorders were included in the study. Treatment patterns, including opioid types, doses, treatment duration, outcomes, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs), were evaluated. Investigators were interviewed on their perceptions of opioid use for spinal disorders.ResultsAmong 2,468 analyzed cases, spinal stenosis (42.8%) was the most common presentation, followed by disc herniation (24.2%) and vertebral fracture (17.5%). In addition, a greater proportion of patients experienced severe pain (73.9%) rather than moderate (19.9%) or mild (0.7%) pain. Oxycodone (51.9%) and fentanyl (50.8%) were the most frequently prescribed opioids; most patients were prescribed relatively low doses. The median duration of opioid treatment was 84 days. Pain relief was superior in patients with longer treatment duration (≥2 months) or with nociceptive pain than in those with shorter treatment duration or with neuropathic or mixed-type pain. ADRs were observed in 8.6% of cases. According to the investigators' survey, "excellent analgesic effect" was a perceived advantage of opioids, while safety concerns were a disadvantage.ConclusionsOpioid usage patterns in patients with spinal disorders are in alignment with international guidelines for spinal pain management. Future prospective studies may address the suitability of opioids for spinal pain treatment by using appropriate objective measurement tools.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19761902 and 19767846
Volume :
10
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Asian Spine Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.47f729ea282a4df482f3044623cf539c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1122