Back to Search Start Over

A More Efficient and Safer Improved Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique—Trajectory Dynamic Adjustment Technique, Technical Note, and Clinical Efficacy

Authors :
Hao Li
Zhiguo Ding
Bin Wei
Zhihao Ma
Jing Xie
Yonghao Tian
Lianlei Wang
Xinyu Liu
Suomao Yuan
Source :
Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 82-93 (2025)
Publication Year :
2025
Publisher :
Wiley, 2025.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) technique requires a very precise entry point of the Jamshidi needle, which leads to repeated adjustments, damaging the pedicle and increasing radiation exposure. This study was designed to propose an improved percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technique‐trajectory dynamic adjustment (TDA) technique, and evaluate its feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes. Method A total of 445 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis associated with instability from June 2017 to May 2022 were included in the retrospective study. They were randomly separated into two groups. Two hundred thirty‐one patients underwent TDA technique (TDA group). Two hundred fourteen patients underwent traditional PPSF technique (PPSF group). All patients underwent postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of screw placement, superior facet joint violation (FJV). The evaluated clinical outcomes were needle insertion time, radiation exposure, blood loss, hospital stay, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for lower back pain (LBP), and leg pain, lumbar interbody fusion rate, and postoperative complications. The independent‐sample t test and paired t‐test were used for continuous data. The contingency table and Mann–Whitney U test were used for categorical data. Results The time of the insertion in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the lateral screw misplacement in TDA group was higher. Moreover, FJV rate was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p 0.05). Conclusion Compared to traditional PPSF technique, TDA technique is a safer and more effective procedure which has shorter surgical time, lower radiation exposure, and lower facet joint violation rate.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17577861 and 17577853
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Orthopaedic Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.46757a03ed1f42b79136bb8547481b16
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14260