Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of zuberitamab plus CHOP versus rituximab plus CHOP for the treatment of drug-naïve patients diagnosed with CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 trial

Authors :
Hui Zhou
Jun Zhu
Yu Yang
Wei Yang
Liling Zhang
Lihong Liu
Mingzhi Zhang
Chuan He
Mei Zhang
Sujun Gao
Zhiming Li
Min Zhou
Hongmei Jing
Qingyuan Zhang
Ying Cheng
Yuqin Song
Zhengzi Qian
Xiuhua Sun
Wenyu Li
Haiyan Yang
Feng Yan
Ying Xiang
Bing Xu
Weihua Zhang
Xiaohong Zhang
Jie Jin
Huilan Liu
Weili Zhao
Ru Feng
Wenqi Jiang
Hong Cen
Fangfang Lv
Yunhong Huang
Ding Yu
Qunyi Guo
Lie Lin
Jianzhen Shen
Donghua Zhang
Jishi Wang
Xiongpeng Zhu
Meizuo Zhong
Jingbo Wang
Zhao Wang
Hongguo Zhao
Source :
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, Vol 12, Iss 10 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2024.

Abstract

Background In patients with untreated CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a phase 3 trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zuberitamab plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; Hi-CHOP) versus rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) treatment regimens.Methods In a 2:1 ratio, eligible patients were assigned randomly to receive treatment of six cycles of either 375 mg/m2 zuberitamab or rituximab together with conventional CHOP chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) at C6D50 served as the primary endpoint, and a non-inferiority margin of 10% was established. The secondary endpoints included the complete response (CR) rate at C6D50, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) judged by blinded-independent review committee (BIRC), overall survival (OS) and safety outcomes.Results Of the 487 randomized patients, 423 patients including 287 in the Hi-CHOP and 136 in the R-CHOP groups completed the C6D50 assessment. For the full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol set (PPS), BIRC-assessed ORR at C6D50 for the Hi-CHOP and R-CHOP groups were 83.5% versus 81.4% and 95.3% versus 93.7%, respectively. The non-inferiority was confirmed as the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the intergroup differences of −5.2% and −3.3%; both were >−10% in the FAS and PPS. The BIRC-assessed CR rate of Hi-CHOP was significantly higher in PPS (85.7% vs 77.3%, p=0.038), but comparable in FAS (75.2% vs 67.9%, p=0.092). After a median follow-up of 29.6 months, patients in the Hi-CHOP group had a slight advantage with regard to the DOR (HR 0.74, p=0.173), PFS (HR 0.67, p=0.057), EFS (HR 0.90, p=0.517) and OS (HR 0.60, p=0.059). Patients with the germinal-center B cell-like subtype who received Hi-CHOP exhibited statistically significant improvements in ORR (p=0.034) and CR rate (p=0.038) at C6D50, EFS (p=0.046) and OS (p=0.014). Treatment-emergent adverse event occurrence rates were comparable across groups (all p>0.05). Infusion-related responses occurred more often in the Hi-CHOP group (32.1% vs 19.9%, p=0.006), all of grade 1–3 severity.Conclusions Zuberitamab (375 mg/m2) plus CHOP was non-inferior to R-CHOP regarding ORR but exhibited a higher CR rate and was well tolerated in CD20-positive, previously untreated Chinese patients with DLBCL.Trial registration number Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000040602, retrospectively registered.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20511426
Volume :
12
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.455cdb1f9ecd4902a56bf02e56ac8ada
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-008895