Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

Authors :
Gwang Ha Kim
Hang Lak Lee
Moon Kyung Joo
Hong Jun Park
Sung Woo Jung
Ok-Jae Lee
Hyungkil Kim
Hoon Jai Chun
Soo Teik Lee
Ji Won Kim
Han Ho Jeon
Il-Kwun Chung
Hyun-Soo Kim
Dong Ho Lee
Kyoung-Oh Kim
Yun Jeong Lim
Seun-Ja Park
Soo-Jeong Cho
Byung-Wook Kim
Kwang Hyun Ko
Seong Woo Jeon
Jae Gyu Kim
In-Kyung Sung
Tae Nyeun Kim
Jae Kyu Sung
Jong-Jae Park
Source :
Gut and Liver, Vol 15, Iss 6, Pp 841-850 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver, 2021.

Abstract

Background/Aims: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of MucostaⓇ (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. Methods: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups: AD-203 twice daily or MucostaⓇ thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; MucostaⓇ, n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; MucostaⓇ, n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. Results: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was −4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and −4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 MucostaⓇ-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. Conclusions: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (MucostaⓇ) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19762283
Volume :
15
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Gut and Liver
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.44cbd1414b764ddf94d0946d9b407a1c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl20338