Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of Kelforce® (l‐glutamic acid, N,N‐diacetic acid, tetrasodium salt (GLDA‐Na4)) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Guido Rychen
Gabriele Aquilina
Giovanna Azimonti
Vasileios Bampidis
Maria de Lourdes Bastos
Georges Bories
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Gerhard Flachowsky
Jürgen Gropp
Boris Kolar
Maryline Kouba
Marta López‐Alonso
Secundino López Puente
Baltasar Mayo
Fernando Ramos
Maria Saarela
Roberto Edoardo Villa
Robert John Wallace
Pieter Wester
Giovanna Martelli
Derek Renshaw
Gloria López‐Gálvez
Alberto Mantovani
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 16, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

Abstract l‐Glutamic acid, N,N‐diacetic acid, tetrasodium salt (GLDA‐Na4) (Kelforce®) is sought to be used as a zootechnical feed additive in chickens for fattening to improve the absorption of zinc from feed, reducing zinc emissions through manure and thus, affecting favourably the environment. The product has not been authorised in the European Union as a feed additive. Kelforce® is intended to be marketed as a liquid and solid formulation, containing ≥ 47% and ≥ 30% of GLDA‐Na4, respectively. Kelforce® is safe for chickens for fattening at the maximum level of 1,000 mg GLDA‐Na4/kg complete feed. Based on the toxicological profile of GLDA‐Na4 and the consumer exposure to GLDA‐Na4 and to nitrilotriacetic acid trisodium salt (NTA‐Na3; an impurity of the additive), the use of Kelforce® at the maximum proposed level in feed of chickens for fattening is of no concern for consumer safety. Due to its low inhalation toxicity, the exposure to GLDA‐Na4 is unlikely to pose a risk by inhalation. However, owing to the high‐dusting potential of the solid formulation, a risk from such high level of dust, even if toxicologically inert, cannot be excluded. Kelforce® is not a skin/eye irritant or skin sensitiser. No risks for the terrestrial compartment were identified at the maximum use level of the additive. Risks for the aquatic compartment cannot be excluded based on the secondary effect of the additive on green algae. In the absence of data, the Panel cannot conclude on the safety for the sediment compartment or the possible ground water contamination. The risk of bioaccumulation and secondary poisoning caused by the additive is considered very low. Owing to the inconsistent and conflicting results from the studies assessed, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) cannot conclude on the efficacy of the additive. The Panel made a recommendation regarding the levels of formaldehyde and cyanide in the active substance.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
16
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.4467b3eec64513ae3fb6a46faf32de
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5279