Back to Search Start Over

Clinical prediction model for prognosis in kidney transplant recipients (KIDMO): study protocol

Authors :
Simon Schwab
Daniel Sidler
Fadi Haidar
Christian Kuhn
Stefan Schaub
Michael Koller
Katell Mellac
Ueli Stürzinger
Bruno Tischhauser
Isabelle Binet
Déla Golshayan
Thomas Müller
Andreas Elmer
Nicola Franscini
Nathalie Krügel
Thomas Fehr
Franz Immer
the Swisstransplant Kidney Working Group (STAN)
the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study
Source :
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMC, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background Many potential prognostic factors for predicting kidney transplantation outcomes have been identified. However, in Switzerland, no widely accepted prognostic model or risk score for transplantation outcomes is being routinely used in clinical practice yet. We aim to develop three prediction models for the prognosis of graft survival, quality of life, and graft function following transplantation in Switzerland. Methods The clinical kidney prediction models (KIDMO) are developed with data from a national multi-center cohort study (Swiss Transplant Cohort Study; STCS) and the Swiss Organ Allocation System (SOAS). The primary outcome is the kidney graft survival (with death of recipient as competing risk); the secondary outcomes are the quality of life (patient-reported health status) at 12 months and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope. Organ donor, transplantation, and recipient-related clinical information will be used as predictors at the time of organ allocation. We will use a Fine & Gray subdistribution model and linear mixed-effects models for the primary and the two secondary outcomes, respectively. Model optimism, calibration, discrimination, and heterogeneity between transplant centres will be assessed using bootstrapping, internal-external cross-validation, and methods from meta-analysis. Discussion Thorough evaluation of the existing risk scores for the kidney graft survival or patient-reported outcomes has been lacking in the Swiss transplant setting. In order to be useful in clinical practice, a prognostic score needs to be valid, reliable, clinically relevant, and preferably integrated into the decision-making process to improve long-term patient outcomes and support informed decisions for clinicians and their patients. The state-of-the-art methodology by taking into account competing risks and variable selection using expert knowledge is applied to data from a nationwide prospective multi-center cohort study. Ideally, healthcare providers together with patients can predetermine the risk they are willing to accept from a deceased-donor kidney, with graft survival, quality of life, and graft function estimates available for their consideration. Study registration Open Science Framework ID: z6mvj

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23977523
Volume :
7
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.42f3e3141afc40f5996ec1dea1143359
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-022-00139-5