Back to Search
Start Over
Ultrasound-Guided Local Anesthetic Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee (IPACK) Block for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Source :
- Local and Regional Anesthesia, Vol Volume 14, Pp 85-98 (2021)
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Dove Medical Press, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Ryan S D’Souza, Brendan J Langford, David A Olsen, Rebecca L Johnson Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USACorrespondence: Rebecca L JohnsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, USA, 55905 Email johnson.rebecca@mayo.eduAbstract: Posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is common despite multimodal analgesia and regional anesthesia use. This review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing analgesic outcomes after inclusion of local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block versus pathways without iPACK. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched from inception to 10/11/2020. Eligible studies evaluated iPACK use on primary outcomes: opioid consumption and pain scores with movement. Secondary outcomes included rest pain, patient satisfaction, length of stay (LOS), gait distance, knee range of motion (ROM), and complications. Bias and quality were appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines. Eight RCTs (777 patients) were included. iPACK block use demonstrated similar opioid consumption in the PACU (4/7 RCTs) and 24 hours after TKA (5/7 RCTs) compared to without iPACK (moderate-quality GRADE evidence). Additionally, iPACK block use demonstrated lower movement pain scores in PACU (3/5 RCTs) but similar or higher pain scores after 24 hours (5/7 RCTs; low-quality GRADE evidence). Studies consistently reported no difference in gait distance (4/4 RCTs) or complications (7/7 RCTs) between treatment arms (high-quality GRADE evidence), although differing effect estimates were observed with resting pain, satisfaction, LOS, and knee ROM. This review provides a foundation of knowledge on iPACK efficacy. While evidence does not currently support widespread inclusion of iPACK within enhanced recovery pathways for TKA, limitations suggest further study is warranted.Keywords: regional anesthesia, analgesia, total knee arthroplasty, pain, treatment outcome, systematic review, meta-analysis
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 11787112
- Volume :
- ume 14
- Database :
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- Journal :
- Local and Regional Anesthesia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsdoj.420cd8d8d1314871986aeb45e8dc408f
- Document Type :
- article