Back to Search Start Over

Carvedilol and metoprolol are both able to preserve myocardial function in type 2 diabetes

Authors :
Carol T. Bussey
Aram A. Babakr
Rachael R. Iremonger
Isabelle vanHout
Gerard T. Wilkins
Regis R. Lamberts
Jeffrey R. Erickson
Source :
Physiological Reports, Vol 8, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Increasing cohorts of patients present with diabetic cardiomyopathy, and with no targeted options, treatment often rely on generic pharmaceuticals such as β‐blockers. β‐blocker efficacy is heterogenous, with second generation β‐blocker metoprolol selectively inhibiting β1‐AR, while third generation β‐blocker carvedilol has α1‐AR inhibition, antioxidant, and anti‐apoptotic actions alongside nonselective β‐AR inhibition. These additional properties have led to the hypothesis that carvedilol may improve cardiac contractility in the diabetic heart to a greater extent than metoprolol. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of metoprolol and carvedilol on myocardial function in animal models and cardiac tissue from patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved ejection fraction. Methods Echocardiographic examination of cardiac function and assessment of myocardial function in isolated trabeculae was carried out in patients with and without diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) who were prescribed metoprolol or carvedilol. Equivalent measures were undertaken in Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats following 4 weeks treatment with metoprolol or carvedilol. Results Patients receiving carvedilol compared to metoprolol had no difference in cardiac function, and no difference was apparent in myocardial function between β‐blockers. Both β‐blockers similarly improved myocardial function in diabetic ZDF rats treated for 4 weeks, without significantly affecting in vivo cardiac function. Conclusions Metoprolol and carvedilol were found to have no effect on cardiac function in type 2 diabetes with preserved ejection fraction, and were similarly effective in preventing myocardial dysfunction in ZDF rats.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2051817X
Volume :
8
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Physiological Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.41b9ebdf408e49ab996df8c593222994
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14394