Back to Search Start Over

Ticks infesting humans and associated pathogens: a cross-sectional study in a 3-year period (2017–2019) in northwest Italy

Authors :
Tania Audino
Alessandra Pautasso
Veronica Bellavia
Valerio Carta
Alessio Ferrari
Federica Verna
Carla Grattarola
Barbara Iulini
Maria Domenica Pintore
Mauro Bardelli
Germano Cassina
Laura Tomassone
Simone Peletto
Valeria Blanda
Alessandra Torina
Maria Caramelli
Cristina Casalone
Rosanna Desiato
Source :
Parasites & Vectors, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMC, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Background Tick-borne diseases are common throughout Europe. Ticks transmit pathogens to the host while feeding and together with mosquitoes, they are major vectors of infectious agents worldwide. In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the incidence of tick-bite events and tick-borne disease in northwest Italy, but information on the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from humans remains scarce. To fill this gap, we report here the prevalence of tick bites and tick-borne pathogens documented for humans in Piedmont, northwest Italy, in the 3-year period 2017–2019. Methods Ticks attached to humans during 2017–2019 were collected from residents of urban and rural area by physicians and veterinarians working with local veterinary agencies. All ticks (n = 1290) were morphologically identified to the species level. A subset of ticks removed from children (age 0–18 years) and the elderly (> 70 years), both age groups considered to be at-risk populations, was screened by biomolecular analysis to detect pathogens (e.g. Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp., Anaplasma spp.). Pathogen identity was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Results Ticks were taxonomically assigned to ten species of six genera (Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus). Most belonged to the genus Ixodes: 1009 ticks (78.22%) were classified as Ixodes ricinus. A subset of 500 ticks collected from the two at-risk populations were subjected to PCR assay to determine the presence of Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp., and Anaplasma spp. The overall prevalence of infection was 22.8% (n = 114; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.19–26.73%), meaning that at least one pathogen was detected: Rickettsia spp. (prevalence 15%, n = 76; 95% CI 12.17–18.65%); Borrelia spp. (prevalence 6.4%, n = 32; 95% CI 4.42–8.92%); and Anaplasma spp. (prevalence 1.2%, n = 6; 95% CI 0.44–2.6%). Conclusions Our data underline the importance of surveillance in the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases and the implementation of strategies to control tick infestation and associated pathogens.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17563305
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Parasites & Vectors
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3ef9605aae4cfeb8a501fe3eb6ab8e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04603-x