Back to Search Start Over

COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF FIXATION OF SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURES OF THE HUMERUS IN CHILDREN

Authors :
HENRIQUE MELO NATALIN
JÉSSICA COLAMARINO SESSA DA SILVA
JOSÉ BATISTA VOLPON
Source :
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, Vol 29, Iss 5, Pp 263-267 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, 2021.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the outcomes of the fixation of complete and displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children with two different Kirschner wire configurations. Methods: The type of fixation was randomized to either crossed (19 cases), or two divergent lateral Kirschner wires (24 cases). The comparison was made six months later between the two treated groups and each group with the non-fractured elbow (clinical alignment, range of motion, Baumann angle, and lateral humeral capitellar angle). Results: 43 children were evaluated (65% boys) with a mean age of six years and five months. The carrying angle (p = 0.94), extension (p = 0.89), and the Flynn´s criteria (p = 0.56) were similar between the groups. The flexion was slightly smaller for the crossed wire group (p = 0.04), but similar to the uninjured side. The Baumann angle was not different between the two fixations (p = 0.79) and the contralateral side (p = 0.1). The lateral humeral capitellar angle was slightly greater for the lateral pinning (p = 0.08), but with no difference with the uninjured elbow (p = 0.62). No iatrogenic injuries were observed. Conclusion: Both fixations presented similar outcomes that did not significantly affect the carrying angle in relation to the non-fractured side. Level of evidence II, Therapeutic study - Investigating the results of treatment.

Details

Language :
English, Portuguese
ISSN :
14137852
Volume :
29
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3ce31514a55443b1a6338c272e1b3b72
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212905240542