Back to Search Start Over

Structural variant analysis of a cancer reference cell line sample using multiple sequencing technologies

Authors :
Keyur Talsania
Tsai-wei Shen
Xiongfong Chen
Erich Jaeger
Zhipan Li
Zhong Chen
Wanqiu Chen
Bao Tran
Rebecca Kusko
Limin Wang
Andy Wing Chun Pang
Zhaowei Yang
Sulbha Choudhari
Michael Colgan
Li Tai Fang
Andrew Carroll
Jyoti Shetty
Yuliya Kriga
Oksana German
Tatyana Smirnova
Tiantain Liu
Jing Li
Ben Kellman
Karl Hong
Alex R. Hastie
Aparna Natarajan
Ali Moshrefi
Anastasiya Granat
Tiffany Truong
Robin Bombardi
Veronnica Mankinen
Daoud Meerzaman
Christopher E. Mason
Jack Collins
Eric Stahlberg
Chunlin Xiao
Charles Wang
Wenming Xiao
Yongmei Zhao
Source :
Genome Biology, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-33 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
BMC, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Background The cancer genome is commonly altered with thousands of structural rearrangements including insertions, deletions, translocation, inversions, duplications, and copy number variations. Thus, structural variant (SV) characterization plays a paramount role in cancer target identification, oncology diagnostics, and personalized medicine. As part of the SEQC2 Consortium effort, the present study established and evaluated a consensus SV call set using a breast cancer reference cell line and matched normal control derived from the same donor, which were used in our companion benchmarking studies as reference samples. Results We systematically investigated somatic SVs in the reference cancer cell line by comparing to a matched normal cell line using multiple NGS platforms including Illumina short-read, 10X Genomics linked reads, PacBio long reads, Oxford Nanopore long reads, and high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C). We established a consensus SV call set of a total of 1788 SVs including 717 deletions, 230 duplications, 551 insertions, 133 inversions, 146 translocations, and 11 breakends for the reference cancer cell line. To independently evaluate and cross-validate the accuracy of our consensus SV call set, we used orthogonal methods including PCR-based validation, Affymetrix arrays, Bionano optical mapping, and identification of fusion genes detected from RNA-seq. We evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each NGS technology for SV determination, and our findings provide an actionable guide to improve cancer genome SV detection sensitivity and accuracy. Conclusions A high-confidence consensus SV call set was established for the reference cancer cell line. A large subset of the variants identified was validated by multiple orthogonal methods.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1474760X
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Genome Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3cca47d9f72844a39a3e5ac2ef139231
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02816-6