Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of aspirin and indobufen in the treatment of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Xiaochen Zhang
Qiaoyan Yan
Jiao Jiang
Hua Luo
Yu Ren
Source :
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol 11 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2024.

Abstract

PurposeThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of aspirin and indobufen in patients with coronary heart disease. The primary focus was on the incidence of cardiovascular events, bleeding events, and gastrointestinal reactions. Given the relatively limited research on indobufen, this study utilized aspirin as a control drug and employed meta-analysis to integrate existing clinical studies. The goal was to provide a reference for the clinical use of indobufen and to suggest directions for further largescale, multicenter prospective studies.MethodsThis review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all relevant literature on indobufen. A total of nine trials met the inclusion criteria, encompassing seven randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and two retrospective studies. Categorical variables were analyzed using odds ratio and random effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included nine trials, comprising seven RCTs and two retrospective studies. The pooled results indicated that indobufen significantly reduced the incidence of minor bleeding events, and gastrointestinal discomfort compared to aspirin. However, both drugs had similar effects on the incidence of recurrent angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and mortality due to coronary heart disease.ConclusionIndobufen was associated with fewer gastrointestinal reactions and a low risk of bleeding, making it a viable option for patients with high-risk factors for bleeding and gastric ulcers. Despite this, indobufen's short history and limited evidence base compared to aspirin highlight the need for further research. Aspirin remains widely available, cost-effective, and the preferred drug for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Indobufen or other antiplatelet agents should only be considered when aspirin is not tolerated or contraindicated. Further clinical trials are necessary to determine whether indobufen can replace aspirin.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier [CRD42024523477].

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2297055X
Volume :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3b8cfb33baa4425947ee75f02635320
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1412944