Back to Search Start Over

A community‐based dynamic choice model for HIV prevention improves PrEP and PEP coverage in rural Uganda and Kenya: a cluster randomized trial

Authors :
Elijah R. Kakande
James Ayieko
Helen Sunday
Edith Biira
Marilyn Nyabuti
George Agengo
Jane Kabami
Colette Aoko
Hellen N. Atuhaire
Norton Sang
Asiphas Owaranganise
Janice Litunya
Erick W. Mugoma
Gabriel Chamie
James Peng
John Schrom
Melanie C. Bacon
Moses R. Kamya
Diane V. Havlir
Maya L. Petersen
Laura B. Balzer
for the SEARCH Study Team
Source :
Journal of the International AIDS Society, Vol 26, Iss 12, Pp n/a-n/a (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Optimizing HIV prevention may require structured approaches for providing client‐centred choices as well as community‐based entry points and delivery. We evaluated the effect of a dynamic choice model for HIV prevention, delivered by community health workers (CHWs) with clinician support, on the use of biomedical prevention among persons at risk of HIV in rural East Africa. Methods We conducted a cluster randomized trial among persons (≥15 years) with current or anticipated HIV risk in 16 villages in Uganda and Kenya (SEARCH; NCT04810650). The intervention was a client‐centred HIV prevention model, including (1) structured client choice of product (pre‐exposure prophylaxis [PrEP] or post‐exposure prophylaxis [PEP]), service location (clinic or out‐of‐clinic) and HIV testing modality (self‐test or rapid test), with the ability to switch over time; (2) a structured assessment of patient barriers and development of a personalized support plan; and (3) phone access to a clinician 24/7. The intervention was delivered by CHWs and supported by clinicians who oversaw PrEP and PEP initiation and monitoring. Participants in control villages were referred to local health facilities for HIV prevention services, delivered by Ministry of Health staff. The primary outcome was biomedical prevention coverage: a proportion of 48‐week follow‐up with self‐reported PrEP or PEP use. Results From May to July 2021, we enrolled 429 people (212 intervention; 217 control): 57% women and 35% aged 15–24 years. Among intervention participants, 58% chose PrEP and 58% chose PEP at least once over follow‐up; self‐testing increased from 52% (baseline) to 71% (week 48); ≥98% chose out‐of‐facility service delivery. Among 413 (96%) participants with the primary outcome ascertained, average biomedical prevention coverage was 28.0% in the intervention versus 0.5% in the control: a difference of 27.5% (95% CI: 23.0–31.9%, p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17582652
Volume :
26
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.39f962d4db4432e84ecb4488bafb879
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26195