Back to Search Start Over

XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An open‐labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX)

Authors :
Xiao‐Dong Zhu
Ming‐Zhu Huang
Yu‐Sheng Wang
Wan‐Jing Feng
Zhi‐Yu Chen
Yi‐Fu He
Xiao‐Wei Zhang
Xin Liu
Chen‐Chen Wang
Wen Zhang
Jie‐Er Ying
Jun Wu
Lei Yang
Yan‐Ru Qin
Jian‐Feng Luo
Xiao‐Ying Zhao
Wen‐Hua Li
Zhe Zhang
Li‐Xin Qiu
Qi‐Rong Geng
Jian‐Ling Zou
Jie‐Yun Zhang
Hong Zheng
Xue‐Feng Song
Shu‐Sheng Wu
Cheng‐Yan Zhang
Zhe Gong
Qin‐Qin Liu
Xiao‐Feng Wang
Qi Xu
Qi Wang
Jian‐Mei Ji
Jian Zhao
Wei‐Jian Guo
Source :
Cancer Communications, Vol 42, Iss 4, Pp 314-326 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Background There is no consensus on whether triplet regimen is better than doublet regimen in the first‐line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, plus capecitabine (EOX) regimens in treating AGC. Methods This phase III trial enrolled previously untreated patients with AGC who were randomly assigned to receive the XELOX or EOX regimen. The primary endpoint was non‐inferiority in progression‐free survival (PFS) for XELOX as compared with EOX on an intention‐to‐treat basis. Results Between April 10, 2015 and August 20, 2020, 448 AGC patients were randomized to receive XELOX (n = 222) or EOX (n = 226). The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5‐6.0 months) in the XELOX arm and 5.5 months (95% CI = 5.0‐6.0 months) in the EOX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.989, 95% CI = 0.812‐1.203; Pnon‐inferiority = 0.003). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (mOS) (12.0 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.384) or objective response rate (37.4% vs. 45.1%, P = 0.291) between the two groups. In patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis, the EOX arm had a significantly longer mOS (P = 0.021) and a trend of longer mPFS (P = 0.073) than the XELOX arm. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 42.2% (90/213) in the XELOX arm and 72.5% (156/215) in the EOX arm (P = 0.001). The global health‐related quality of life (QoL) score was significantly higher in the XELOX arm than in the EOX arm during chemotherapy. Conclusions This non‐inferiority trial demonstrated that the doublet regimen was as effective as the triplet regimen and had a better safety profile and QoL as a first‐line treatment for AGC patients. However, the triplet regimen might have a survival advantage in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25233548
Volume :
42
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Cancer Communications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3847a66d6c7b4f0a892d3bcfe99399f3
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12278