Back to Search Start Over

Enhancing Clinical Research Professionals’ Training and Qualifications (ECRPTQ): Recommendations for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) training for investigators and study coordinators

Authors :
Thomas P. Shanley
Nancy A. Calvin-Naylor
Ruthvick Divecha
Michelle M. Wartak
Karen Blackwell
Jonathan M. Davis
Edward F. Ellerbeck
Karl Kieburtz
Margaret J. Koziel
Katherine Luzuriaga
Jennifer Maddox
Nancy A. Needler
Susan Murphy
Kieran Pemberton
Catherine Radovich
Eric P. Rubinstein
Harry P. Selker
Pamela Tenaerts
Kelly Unsworth
Kay Wilson
Jonelle E. Wright
Richard Barohn
Source :
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 1, Pp 8-15 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Abstract

Introduction The translation of discoveries to drugs, devices, and behavioral interventions requires well-prepared study teams. Execution of clinical trials remains suboptimal due to varied quality in design, execution, analysis, and reporting. A critical impediment is inconsistent, or even absent, competency-based training for clinical trial personnel. Methods In 2014, the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) funded the project, Enhancing Clinical Research Professionals’ Training and Qualifications (ECRPTQ), aimed at addressing this deficit. The goal was to ensure all personnel are competent to execute clinical trials. A phased structure was utilized. Results This paper focuses on training recommendations in Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Leveraging input from all Clinical and Translational Science Award hubs, the following was recommended to NCATS: all investigators and study coordinators executing a clinical trial should understand GCP principles and undergo training every 3 years, with the training method meeting the minimum criteria identified by the International Conference on Harmonisation GCP. Conclusions We anticipate that industry sponsors will acknowledge such training, eliminating redundant training requests. We proposed metrics to be tracked that required further study. A separate task force was composed to define recommendations for metrics to be reported to NCATS.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20598661
Volume :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.36478c92f6344be3ad375e74d91b3a19
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2016.1