Back to Search Start Over

Refined understanding of the impact of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex diversity on the intrinsic susceptibility to pretomanid

Authors :
Praharshinie Rupasinghe
Rabab Reenaers
Jens Vereecken
Wim Mulders
Sari Cogneau
Matthias Merker
Stefan Niemann
Shaheed Vally Omar
Leen Rigouts
Claudio U. Köser
Tom Decroo
Bouke C. de Jong
Source :
Microbiology Spectrum, Vol 12, Iss 3 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
American Society for Microbiology, 2024.

Abstract

ABSTRACTPrevious work reported unprecedented differences in the intrinsic in vitro susceptibility of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) to pretomanid (Pa) using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system. We tested 125 phylogenetically diverse strains from all known MTBC lineages (1–9) without known Pa resistance mutations and four strains with known resistance mutations as controls. This confirmed that MTBC, unlike most bacteria-antimicrobial combinations, displayed substantial differences in the intrinsic susceptibility relative to the technical variation of Pa MIC testing. This was also the case for the Middlebrook 7H11 (7H11) medium, demonstrating that these differences were not specific to MGIT. Notably, lineage 1 was confirmed to have intrinsically elevated MICs compared with lineages 2, 3, 4, and 7 (L2–4/7), underlining the urgent need for WHO to publish its decision of whether lineage 1 should be deemed treatable by BPaL(M), the now preferred all-oral regimen for treating rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. Lineages 5 and 6, which are most frequent in West Africa, responded differently to Pa, with lineage 5 being more similar to L2–4/7 and lineage 6 being more susceptible. More data are needed to determine whether 7H11 MICs are systematically lower than those in MGIT.IMPORTANCEThis study confirmed that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex lineage 1, responsible for 28% of global tuberculosis cases, is less susceptible to pretomanid (Pa). It also refined the understanding of the intrinsic susceptibilities of lineages 5 and 6, most frequent in West Africa, and lineages 8 and 9. Regulators must review whether these in vitro differences affect the clinical efficacy of the WHO-recommended BPaL(M) regimen and set breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing accordingly. Notably, regulators should provide detailed justifications for their decisions to facilitate public scrutiny.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21650497
Volume :
12
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Microbiology Spectrum
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3579e8ac7f542119ed18bac4f2001e4
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00070-24