Back to Search Start Over

Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with either low- or high-volume of convalescent plasma versus standard of care: A multicenter Bayesian randomized open-label clinical trial (COOP-COVID-19-MCTI)

Authors :
Alice T.W. Song
Vanderson Rocha
Alfredo Mendrone-Júnior
Rodrigo T. Calado
Gil C. De Santis
Bruno D. Benites
Carolina Costa-Lima
Taiani Vargas
Leonardo S. Marques
Juliana C. Fernandes
Felipe C. Breda
Silvano Wendel
Roberta Fachini
Luiz V. Rizzo
José Mauro Kutner
Vivian I. Avelino-Silva
Rafael R.G. Machado
Edison L. Durigon
Sylvie Chevret
Esper G. Kallas
Source :
The Lancet Regional Health. Americas, Vol 10, Iss , Pp 100216- (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Summary: Background: Administration of convalescent plasma may serve as an adjunct to supportive treatment to prevent COVID-19 progression and death. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 volumes of intravenous convalescent plasma (CP) with high antibody titers for the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a Bayesian, randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in 7 Brazilian hospitals. Adults admitted to hospital with positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV2, within 10 days of the symptom onset, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard of care (SoC) alone, or in combination with 200 mL (150–300 mL) of CP (Low-volume), or 400 mL (300–600 mL) of CP (High-volume); infusion had to be performed within 24 h of randomization. Randomization was centralized, stratified by center. The primary outcome was the time until clinical improvement up to day 28, measured by the WHO ten-point scale, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Interim and terminal analyses were performed in a Bayesian framework. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04415086. Findings: Between June 2, 2020, and November 18, 2020, 129 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SoC (n = 42), Low-volume (n = 43) or High-volume (n = 44) CP. Donors presented a median titer of neutralizing antibodies of 1:320 (interquartile range, 1:160 to 1:1088). No evidence of any benefit of convalescent plasma was observed, with Bayesian estimate of 28-day clinical improvement of 72.7% (95%CI, 58.8 to 84.7) in the SoC versus 64.1% (95%ci, 53.8 to 73.7) in the pooled experimental groups (mean difference of -8.7%, 95%CI, -24.6 to 8.2). There was one case of cutaneous mild allergic reaction related to plasma transfusion and one case of suspected transfusion-related acute lung injury but deemed not to be related to convalescent plasma infusion. Interpretation: In this prospective, randomized trial of adult hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, convalescent plasma was not associated with clinical benefits. Funding: Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2667193X
Volume :
10
Issue :
100216-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Lancet Regional Health. Americas
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.33c64ec0c18d4d839ce688a146201e26
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100216